Intel UHD Graphics 600 versus Intel HD Graphics 6000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 600 and Intel HD Graphics 6000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 600
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 3 mois plus tard
- 3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 5 Watt versus 15 Watt
| Date de sortie | 11 December 2017 versus 5 September 2014 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt versus 15 Watt |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 6000
- Environ 50% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 300 MHz versus 200 MHz
- Environ 33% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1000 MHz versus 750 MHz
- 4x plus de pipelines: 48 versus 12
- 2.8x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 875 versus 318
- 3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 273 versus 92
- 3.5x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 3519 versus 1004
- 2.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1225 versus 476
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1363 versus 1000
- Environ 92% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3259 versus 1701
- 2.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1225 versus 476
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1363 versus 1000
- Environ 92% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3259 versus 1701
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz versus 200 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1000 MHz versus 750 MHz |
| Pipelines | 48 versus 12 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 875 versus 318 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 273 versus 92 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3519 versus 1004 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1225 versus 476 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1363 versus 1000 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3259 versus 1701 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1225 versus 476 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1363 versus 1000 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3259 versus 1701 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 600
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 6000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel UHD Graphics 600 | Intel HD Graphics 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 318 | 875 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 92 | 273 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1004 | 3519 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.952 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 56.77 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.427 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 5.876 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 6.882 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 476 | 1225 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1000 | 1363 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1701 | 3259 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 476 | 1225 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1000 | 1363 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1701 | 3259 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel UHD Graphics 600 | Intel HD Graphics 6000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Generation 8.0 |
| Nom de code | Gemini Lake GT1 | Broadwell GT3 |
| Date de sortie | 11 December 2017 | 5 September 2014 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1624 | 1126 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 750 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 200 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 12 | 48 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 189 million | 189 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x1 |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR4 / LPDDR4 | |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel UHD Graphics 600 avec des autres
IntelUHD Graphics 600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7500 LE
IntelUHD Graphics 600 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 1500
IntelUHD Graphics 600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 8600 GT
IntelUHD Graphics 600 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6450
IntelUHD Graphics 600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 610
IntelUHD Graphics 600 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8250
