Intel UHD Graphics 600 versus AMD Radeon HD 6450
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 600 and AMD Radeon HD 6450 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 600
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 6 ans 8 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 40 nm
- 6x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 5 Watt versus 30 Watt
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 319 versus 198
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 1004 versus 632
- 3.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 5.952 versus 1.878
- Environ 85% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.427 versus 0.231
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 5.876 versus 4.982
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1000 versus 810
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1701 versus 1627
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1000 versus 810
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1701 versus 1627
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 11 December 2017 versus 7 April 2011 |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt versus 30 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 319 versus 198 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1004 versus 632 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.952 versus 1.878 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.427 versus 0.231 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 5.876 versus 4.982 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1000 versus 810 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1701 versus 1627 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1000 versus 810 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1701 versus 1627 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 6450
- 13.3x plus de pipelines: 160 versus 12
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 119 versus 92
- Environ 71% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 97.327 versus 56.77
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 19.314 versus 6.882
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 497 versus 476
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 497 versus 476
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 160 versus 12 |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 119 versus 92 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 97.327 versus 56.77 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.314 versus 6.882 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 497 versus 476 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 497 versus 476 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 600
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6450
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | Intel UHD Graphics 600 | AMD Radeon HD 6450 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 319 | 198 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 92 | 119 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1004 | 632 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.952 | 1.878 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 56.77 | 97.327 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.427 | 0.231 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 5.876 | 4.982 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 6.882 | 19.314 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 476 | 497 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1000 | 810 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1701 | 1627 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 476 | 497 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1000 | 810 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1701 | 1627 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel UHD Graphics 600 | AMD Radeon HD 6450 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | TeraScale 2 |
Nom de code | Gemini Lake GT1 | Caicos |
Date de sortie | 11 December 2017 | 7 April 2011 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1625 | 1628 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Conception | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $55 | |
Prix maintenant | $39.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 9.02 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 750 MHz | 750 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 200 MHz | |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 12 | 160 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt | 30 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 189 million | 370 million |
Performance á point flottant | 200.0 gflops | |
Stream Processors | 160 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 5 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Nombre d’écrans Eyefinity | 4 | |
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Soutien de bus | PCIe 2.0 x8 | |
Longeur | 168 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Genre de mémoire | DDR4 / LPDDR4 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
RAM maximale | 1 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 8.5-12.8 GB/x (DDR3) or 25.6-28.8 GB/s (GDDR5) | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 800 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire |