Intel UHD Graphics 605 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 620
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 605 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 605
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 ans 6 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 40 nm
- 9.8x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 5 Watt versus 49 Watt
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.247 versus 4.046
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.406 versus 0.371
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 724 versus 614
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1643 versus 1162
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1961 versus 1683
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 724 versus 614
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1643 versus 1162
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1961 versus 1683
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 11 December 2017 versus 15 May 2012 |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt versus 49 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.247 versus 4.046 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.406 versus 0.371 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 724 versus 614 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1643 versus 1162 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1961 versus 1683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 724 versus 614 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1643 versus 1162 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1961 versus 1683 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 620
- 3.5x plus de vitesse du noyau: 700 MHz versus 200 MHz
- 5.3x plus de pipelines: 96 versus 18
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 377 versus 372
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 159 versus 110
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 1550 versus 1455
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 83.907 versus 66.304
- Environ 74% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 6.791 versus 3.902
- 3.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 17.41 versus 5.113
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 700 MHz versus 200 MHz |
| Pipelines | 96 versus 18 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 377 versus 372 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 159 versus 110 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1550 versus 1455 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 83.907 versus 66.304 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.791 versus 3.902 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 17.41 versus 5.113 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 605
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 620
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel UHD Graphics 605 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 372 | 377 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 110 | 159 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1455 | 1550 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.247 | 4.046 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 66.304 | 83.907 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.406 | 0.371 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 3.902 | 6.791 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 5.113 | 17.41 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 724 | 614 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1643 | 1162 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1961 | 1683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 724 | 614 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1643 | 1162 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1961 | 1683 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel UHD Graphics 605 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Fermi |
| Nom de code | Gemini Lake GT1 | GF108 |
| Date de sortie | 11 December 2017 | 15 May 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1541 | 1546 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $39.99 | |
| Prix maintenant | $39.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 13.32 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 800 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 200 MHz | 700 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 18 | 96 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt | 49 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 189 million | 585 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 96 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 268.8 gflops | |
| Température maximale du GPU | 98 °C | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 11.2 billion / sec | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI, VGA |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Hauteur | 2.7" (6.9 cm) | |
| Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Mémoire |
||
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR4 / LPDDR4 | DDR3 |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1.8 GB/s | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| CUDA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel UHD Graphics 605 avec des autres
IntelUHD Graphics 605 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 8600 GTS
IntelUHD Graphics 605 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 8300 GS
IntelUHD Graphics 605 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8330E
IntelUHD Graphics 605 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8280E
IntelUHD Graphics 605 vs
AMDRadeon R4 Graphics
IntelUHD Graphics 605 vs
AMDRadeon Vega 6 Mobile Efficient
