Intel UHD Graphics 605 versus AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 605 and AMD Radeon R4 Graphics pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 605
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 6 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 5 Watt versus 15 Watt
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 371 versus 336
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 108 versus 99
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 724 versus 701
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1643 versus 1338
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1961 versus 1811
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 724 versus 701
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1643 versus 1338
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1961 versus 1811
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 11 December 2017 versus 11 June 2014 |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt versus 15 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 371 versus 336 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 108 versus 99 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 724 versus 701 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1643 versus 1338 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1961 versus 1811 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 724 versus 701 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1643 versus 1338 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1961 versus 1811 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
- 4x plus de vitesse du noyau: 800 MHz versus 200 MHz
- 7.1x plus de pipelines: 128 versus 18
- 5.7x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 8386 versus 1459
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.721 versus 4.247
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 107.613 versus 66.304
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.445 versus 0.406
- 2.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 10.612 versus 3.902
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 13.097 versus 5.113
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 800 MHz versus 200 MHz |
Pipelines | 128 versus 18 |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8386 versus 1459 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.721 versus 4.247 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 107.613 versus 66.304 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.445 versus 0.406 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.612 versus 3.902 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 13.097 versus 5.113 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 605
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | Intel UHD Graphics 605 | AMD Radeon R4 Graphics |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 371 | 336 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 108 | 99 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1459 | 8386 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.247 | 4.721 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 66.304 | 107.613 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.406 | 0.445 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 3.902 | 10.612 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 5.113 | 13.097 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 724 | 701 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1643 | 1338 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1961 | 1811 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 724 | 701 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1643 | 1338 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1961 | 1811 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel UHD Graphics 605 | AMD Radeon R4 Graphics | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | GCN 2.0 |
Nom de code | Gemini Lake GT1 | Beema |
Date de sortie | 11 December 2017 | 11 June 2014 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1547 | 1548 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 800 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 200 MHz | 800 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 18 | 128 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt | 15 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 189 million | 930 million |
Performance á point flottant | 204.8 gflops | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 6.4 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | IGP |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | |
Genre de mémoire | DDR4 / LPDDR4 | System Shared |
Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |