Intel UHD Graphics 620 versus NVIDIA GeForce 910M

Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 620 and NVIDIA GeForce 910M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

Intel UHD Graphics 620

versus

NVIDIA GeForce 910M

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 620

La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 0 mois plus tard
Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
2.2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 33 Watt
Environ 77% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1043 versus 590
2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 243 versus 120
Environ 75% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 4591 versus 2629
4.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.062 versus 6.448
Environ 75% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 273.504 versus 155.993
3.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.777 versus 0.574
Environ 63% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.939 versus 12.2
Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 31.881 versus 27.733
Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1397 versus 1344
Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1397 versus 1344

Caractéristiques
Date de sortie	1 September 2017 versus 18 August 2015
Processus de fabrication	14 nm versus 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt versus 33 Watt
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark	1043 versus 590
PassMark - G2D Mark	243 versus 120
Geekbench - OpenCL	4591 versus 2629
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	27.062 versus 6.448
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	273.504 versus 155.993
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.777 versus 0.574
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	19.939 versus 12.2
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	31.881 versus 27.733
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1397 versus 1344
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1397 versus 1344

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 910M

2.6x plus de vitesse du noyau: 775 MHz versus 300 MHz
16x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 24
2.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2590 versus 878
Environ 36% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3020 versus 2227
2.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2590 versus 878
Environ 36% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3020 versus 2227

Caractéristiques
Vitesse du noyau	775 MHz versus 300 MHz
Pipelines	384 versus 24
Référence
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2590 versus 878
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3020 versus 2227
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2590 versus 878
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3020 versus 2227

Comparer les références

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 910M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1043

590

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

243

120

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

4591

2629

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

27.062

6.448

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

273.504

155.993

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1.777

0.574

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

19.939

12.2

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

31.881

27.733

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1397

1344

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

878

2590

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2227

3020

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1397

1344

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

878

2590

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2227

3020

Nom	Intel UHD Graphics 620	NVIDIA GeForce 910M
PassMark - G3D Mark	1043	590
PassMark - G2D Mark	243	120
Geekbench - OpenCL	4591	2629
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	27.062	6.448
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	273.504	155.993
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.777	0.574
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	19.939	12.2
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	31.881	27.733
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1397	1344
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	878	2590
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2227	3020
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1397	1344
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	878	2590
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2227	3020
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	366

Comparer les caractéristiques

	Intel UHD Graphics 620	NVIDIA GeForce 910M
Essentiel
Architecture	Generation 9.5	Fermi 2.0
Nom de code	Kaby Lake GT2	GF117
Date de sortie	1 September 2017	18 August 2015
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	1380	1381
Genre	Laptop	Laptop
Infos techniques
Vitesse augmenté	1150 MHz
Vitesse du noyau	300 MHz	775 MHz
Processus de fabrication	14 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	24	384
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt	33 Watt
Compte de transistor	189 million	585 million
Performance á point flottant		297.6 gflops
Taux de remplissage de la texture		12.4 GTexel / s
Sorties et ports de vidéo
Connecteurs d’écran	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x1	PCIe 2.0 x16
Soutien de bus		PCI Express 3.0
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires		None
Soutien API
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Mémoire
RAM maximale	32 GB
Largeur du bus mémoire	64 / 128 Bit	64 Bit
Genre de mémoire	LPDDR3 / DDR4	DDR3
Mémoire partagé	1	0
Bande passante de la mémoire		14.4 GB / s
Vitesse de mémoire		1800 MHz
Technologies
Quick Sync
CUDA
GameWorks
GPU Boost
Optimus