Intel UHD Graphics 630 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 630 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 630
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 89% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 28.8 GTexel / s versus 15.26 GTexel / s
- Environ 26% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 460.8 gflops versus 366.3 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 27% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 19 Watt
- Environ 98% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1239 versus 625
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 300 versus 213
- 2.4x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 4658 versus 1947
- 4.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.517 versus 6.705
- 3.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 354.254 versus 100.391
- 4.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.807 versus 0.441
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 20.323 versus 8.146
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 29.327 versus 20.64
- Environ 91% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1870 versus 977
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1596 versus 1494
- Environ 81% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3309 versus 1833
- Environ 91% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1870 versus 977
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1596 versus 1494
- Environ 81% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3309 versus 1833
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 versus 27 March 2014 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 28.8 GTexel / s versus 15.26 GTexel / s |
Performance á point flottant | 460.8 gflops versus 366.3 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 19 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1239 versus 625 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 300 versus 213 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4658 versus 1947 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.517 versus 6.705 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 354.254 versus 100.391 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.807 versus 0.441 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.323 versus 8.146 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.327 versus 20.64 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1870 versus 977 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1596 versus 1494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 versus 1833 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1870 versus 977 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1596 versus 1494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 versus 1833 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
- 2.7x plus de vitesse du noyau: 954 MHz versus 350 MHz
- 8x plus de pipelines: 192 versus 24
- 2.8x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 192 versus 68
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 954 MHz versus 350 MHz |
Pipelines | 192 versus 24 |
Référence | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 192 versus 68 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1239 | 625 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 300 | 213 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4658 | 1947 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.517 | 6.705 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 354.254 | 100.391 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.807 | 0.441 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.323 | 8.146 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.327 | 20.64 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1870 | 977 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1596 | 1494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 | 1833 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1870 | 977 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1596 | 1494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 | 1833 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 68 | 192 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel UHD Graphics 630 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Kepler 2.0 |
Nom de code | Coffee Lake GT2 | GK208B |
Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 | 27 March 2014 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1246 | 1486 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $34.99 | |
Prix maintenant | $34.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 23.15 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 350 MHz | 954 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 460.8 gflops | 366.3 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 192 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 28.8 GTexel / s | 15.26 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 19 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 189 million | 292 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 192 | |
Température maximale du GPU | 95 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | Dual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x8 |
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Hauteur | 2.713" (6.9 cm) | |
Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1.8 GB/s | |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
PhysX | ||
PureVideo |