Intel UHD Graphics 630 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 630 and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 630
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 6 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 15% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 28.8 GTexel / s versus 25.1 billion / sec
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 40 nm
- 7.1x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 106 Watt
- Environ 86% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.517 versus 14.758
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 354.254 versus 302.509
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.807 versus 0.965
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 20.323 versus 14.925
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 29.327 versus 27.656
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 versus 13 September 2010 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 28.8 GTexel / s versus 25.1 billion / sec |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 106 Watt |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.517 versus 14.758 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 354.254 versus 302.509 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.807 versus 0.965 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.323 versus 14.925 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.327 versus 27.656 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
- 4.5x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1566 MHz versus 350 MHz
- 8x plus de pipelines: 192 versus 24
- Environ 30% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 601.3 gflops versus 460.8 gflops
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1322 versus 1237
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 310 versus 299
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 4907 versus 4657
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2160 versus 1870
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3365 versus 1596
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2160 versus 1870
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3365 versus 1596
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1566 MHz versus 350 MHz |
Pipelines | 192 versus 24 |
Performance á point flottant | 601.3 gflops versus 460.8 gflops |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1322 versus 1237 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 310 versus 299 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4907 versus 4657 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2160 versus 1870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3365 versus 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3325 versus 3309 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2160 versus 1870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3365 versus 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3325 versus 3309 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1237 | 1322 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 299 | 310 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4657 | 4907 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.517 | 14.758 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 354.254 | 302.509 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.807 | 0.965 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.323 | 14.925 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.327 | 27.656 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1870 | 2160 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1596 | 3365 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 | 3325 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1870 | 2160 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1596 | 3365 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 | 3325 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 68 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel UHD Graphics 630 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Fermi |
Nom de code | Coffee Lake GT2 | GF106 |
Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 | 13 September 2010 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1234 | 1130 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $129 | |
Prix maintenant | $64.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 26.46 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 350 MHz | 1566 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 460.8 gflops | 601.3 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 192 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 28.8 GTexel / s | 25.1 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 106 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 189 million | 1,170 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 192 | |
Température maximale du GPU | 100 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI |
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Soutien de bus | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | |
Hauteur | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Longeur | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
Options SLI | 2-way | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.2 |
Mémoire |
||
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
RAM maximale | 1 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 57.7 GB / s | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1804 (3608 data rate) MHz | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
SLI |