Intel UHD Graphics 750 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 750 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Soutien API, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 750
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 11 ans 0 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 20.80 GTexel/s versus 14.43 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 40 nm
- 3.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 49 Watt
- 2.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1724 versus 830
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 364 versus 253
- 2.2x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 6447 versus 2902
- 3.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 35.179 versus 10.872
- 3.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 543.594 versus 166.832
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.995 versus 0.817
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 29.322 versus 12.415
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2899 versus 1951
- Environ 90% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3219 versus 1693
- 3.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 11068 versus 3324
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2899 versus 1951
- Environ 90% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3219 versus 1693
- 3.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 11068 versus 3324
- Environ 96% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 641 versus 327
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 2021 versus 18 June 2014 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 20.80 GTexel/s versus 14.43 GTexel / s |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 49 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1724 versus 830 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 364 versus 253 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6447 versus 2902 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 35.179 versus 10.872 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 543.594 versus 166.832 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.995 versus 0.817 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.322 versus 12.415 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2899 versus 1951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3219 versus 1693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 11068 versus 3324 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2899 versus 1951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3219 versus 1693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 11068 versus 3324 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 641 versus 327 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
- 2.3x plus de vitesse du noyau: 700 MHz versus 300 MHz
- Environ 50% de pipelines plus haut: 384 versus 256
Vitesse du noyau | 700 MHz versus 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 384 versus 256 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 750
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | Intel UHD Graphics 750 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1724 | 830 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 364 | 253 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6447 | 2902 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 35.179 | 10.872 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 543.594 | 166.832 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.995 | 0.817 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.322 | 12.415 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2899 | 1951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3219 | 1693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 11068 | 3324 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2899 | 1951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3219 | 1693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 11068 | 3324 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 641 | 327 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 36.916 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel UHD Graphics 750 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.1 | Fermi |
Nom de code | Rocket Lake GT1 | GF108 |
Date de sortie | 2021 | 18 June 2014 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 748 | 1311 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $59.99 | |
Prix maintenant | $54.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 20.48 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1300 MHz | |
Unités de Compute | 32 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 700 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 166.4 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1331 GFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 665.6 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 256 | 384 |
Pixel fill rate | 10.40 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 20.80 GTexel/s | 14.43 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 49 Watt |
Performance á point flottant | 692.7 gflops | |
Compte de transistor | 585 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Longeur | 145 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 40.1 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1600 MHz | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 |