Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) versus AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) and AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
- Environ 2% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1100 MHz versus 1082 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 10 nm versus 14 nm
- 2.6x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 25 Watt versus 65 Watt
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3505 versus 3274
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3505 versus 3274
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1100 MHz versus 1082 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 10 nm versus 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt versus 65 Watt |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3505 versus 3274 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3505 versus 3274 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
- 3.1x plus de vitesse du noyau: 925 MHz versus 300 MHz
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2524 versus 1887
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2524 versus 1887
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 925 MHz versus 300 MHz |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2524 versus 1887 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2524 versus 1887 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) | AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1887 | 2524 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1887 | 2524 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3505 | 3274 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3505 | 3274 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 3352 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 3352 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2428 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 444 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 14535 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.896 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 486.804 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.503 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.111 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 100.658 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) | AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Intel Gen. 11 (Ice Lake) | Polaris |
| Nom de code | Ice Lake G1 Gen. 11 | Lexa |
| Date de sortie | 28 May 2019 | 27 May 2019 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 884 | 813 |
| Genre | Laptop | Workstation |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $199 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1100 MHz | 1082 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 10 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 32 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Unités de Compute | 10 | |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 86.56 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1,385 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1,385 GFLOPS | |
| Pixel fill rate | 17.31 GPixel/s | |
| Stream Processors | 640 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 34.62 GTexel/s | |
| Compte de transistor | 2200 million | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| Genre de mémoire | DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | Yes | |
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 96 GB/s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 4x mini-DisplayPort | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Hauteur | Half Height | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
| Longeur | 6.6" (168 mm) | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) avec des autres
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
NVIDIAGeForce 256 DDR
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
ATIMobility Radeon X700
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7950 GT
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
NVIDIAP106-090
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX250
