Revue de la carte vidéo AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
Radeon Pro WX 3200 carte vidéo sortie par AMD; release date: 27 May 2019. Au jour du sortie, la carte vidéo couta $199. La carte video est conçue pour les ordinateurs workstation et est basé sur la microarchitecture Polaris nom de code Lexa.
Vitesse du noyau - 925 MHz. Vitesse augmenté - 1082 MHz. Taux de remplissage de la texture - 34.62 GTexel/s. Technologie de fabrication - 14 nm . Compte de transistors - 2200 million. Utilisation d’énergie (TDP) - 65 Watt.
Type de mémoire: GDDR5. Amonte maximale de RAM - 4 GB. Largeur du bus mémoire - 128 bit. Vitesse du mémoire - 4000 MHz. Bande passant du mémoire - 96 GB/s.
Référence
| PassMark G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop Face Detection |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop Ocean Surface Simulation |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop T-Rex |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop Video Composition |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop Bitcoin Mining |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 Car Chase Offscreen |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 Manhattan |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 T-Rex |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 Car Chase Offscreen |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 Manhattan |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 T-Rex |
|
|
| Nom | Valeur |
|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2428 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 444 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 14535 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection | 25.896 mPixels/s |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation | 486.804 Frames/s |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex | 2.503 Frames/s |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition | 53.111 Frames/s |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining | 100.658 mHash/s |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen | 2524 Frames |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan | 3274 Frames |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex | 3352 Frames |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen | 2524.000 Fps |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan | 3274.000 Fps |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex | 3352.000 Fps |
Performance des jeux
Control (2019)
| Low, 1280x720 | 42.40 |
| Medium, 1920x1080 | 12.50 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 8.30 |
Total War: Three Kingdoms (2019)
| Low, 1280x720 | 55.50 |
| Medium, 1920x1080 | 15.30 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 9.90 |
| Ultra, 1920x1080 | 4.00 |
F1 2019 (2019)
| Low, 1280x720 | 59.00 |
| Medium, 1920x1080 | 33.00 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 25.00 |
| Ultra, 1920x1080 | 15.00 |
Rage 2 (2019)
| Low, 1280x720 | 40.90 |
| Medium, 1920x1080 | 16.80 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 14.10 |
| Ultra, 1920x1080 | 10.00 |
Metro Exodus (2019)
| Low, 1280x720 | 31.10 |
| Medium, 1920x1080 | 14.00 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 10.00 |
| Ultra, 1920x1080 | 7.00 |
Apex Legends (2019)
| Low, 1280x720 | 65.90 |
| Medium, 1920x1080 | 24.30 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 15.10 |
| Ultra, 1920x1080 | 13.20 |
Far Cry 5 (2018)
| Low, 1280x720 | 43.00 |
| Medium, 1920x1080 | 20.00 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 18.00 |
| Ultra, 1920x1080 | 17.00 |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)
| Low, 1280x720 | 25.20 |
| Medium, 1920x1080 | 16.65 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 15.15 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)
| Low, 1280x720 | 26.30 |
| Medium, 1920x1080 | 9.70 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 6.30 |
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)
| Low, 1024x768 | 50.60 |
| Medium, 1366x768 | 36.22 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 18.54 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)
| Low, 1280x720 | 100.50 |
| Medium, 1366x768 | 86.50 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 48.55 |
| Ultra, 1920x1080 | 34.85 |
| 4K, 3840x2160 | 9.40 |
The Witcher 3 (2015)
| Low, 1024x768 | 58.10 |
| Medium, 1366x768 | 31.05 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 15.15 |
| Ultra, 1920x1080 | 10.30 |
| 4K, 3840x2160 | 5.20 |
Thief (2014)
| Medium, 1366x768 | 36.40 |
| High, 1366x768 | 34.90 |
| Ultra, 1920x1080 | 19.90 |
BioShock Infinite (2013)
| Low, 1280x720 | 186.60 |
| Medium, 1366x768 | 90.40 |
| High, 1366x768 | 82.35 |
| Ultra, 1920x1080 | 29.58 |
Tomb Raider (2013)
| Low, 1024x768 | 184.60 |
| Medium, 1366x768 | 98.50 |
| High, 1366x768 | 71.80 |
| Ultra, 1920x1080 | 35.00 |
Caractéristiques
Essentiel |
|
| Architecture | Polaris |
| Nom de code | Lexa |
| Date de sortie | 27 May 2019 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $199 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 813 |
| Genre | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
|
| Vitesse augmenté | 1082 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 10 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 925 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 86.56 GFLOPS |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1,385 GFLOPS |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1,385 GFLOPS |
| Pixel fill rate | 17.31 GPixel/s |
| Stream Processors | 640 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 34.62 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 2200 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
|
| Connecteurs d’écran | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
|
| Hauteur | Half Height |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Longeur | 6.6" (168 mm) |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None |
Soutien API |
|
| DirectX | 12.0 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | |
Mémoire |
|
| RAM maximale | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 96 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
|
| AMD Eyefinity | |
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | |
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 avec des autres
AMDRadeon Pro WX 3200 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6800 GT
AMDRadeon Pro WX 3200 vs
AMDRadeon E9260 PCIe
AMDRadeon Pro WX 3200 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 11
AMDRadeon Pro WX 3200 vs
IntelIris Plus Graphics 645
AMDRadeon Pro WX 3200 vs
AMDRadeon Vega 9
AMDRadeon Pro WX 3200 vs
AMDRadeon RX 640
