Intel UHD Graphics P630 versus Intel UHD Graphics 630
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics P630 and Intel UHD Graphics 630 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics P630
- Environ 68% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2075 versus 1237
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 333 versus 299
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 5648 versus 4657
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 387.561 versus 354.254
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.089 versus 1.807
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 24.713 versus 20.323
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 37.743 versus 29.327
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2010 versus 1870
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2273 versus 1596
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2010 versus 1870
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2273 versus 1596
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2075 versus 1237 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 333 versus 299 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5648 versus 4657 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 387.561 versus 354.254 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.089 versus 1.807 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.713 versus 20.323 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 37.743 versus 29.327 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2010 versus 1870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2273 versus 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2010 versus 1870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2273 versus 1596 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 630
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.517 versus 20.49
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3309 versus 3019
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3309 versus 3019
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.517 versus 20.49 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 versus 3019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 versus 3019 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics P630
GPU 2: Intel UHD Graphics 630
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | Intel UHD Graphics P630 | Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2075 | 1237 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 333 | 299 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5648 | 4657 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 20.49 | 27.517 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 387.561 | 354.254 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.089 | 1.807 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.713 | 20.323 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 37.743 | 29.327 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2010 | 1870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2273 | 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3019 | 3309 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2010 | 1870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2273 | 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3019 | 3309 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 68 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel UHD Graphics P630 | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1082 | 1234 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | |
Nom de code | Coffee Lake GT2 | |
Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 350 MHz | 350 MHz |
Pipelines | 24 | 24 |
Performance á point flottant | 460.8 gflops | |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 28.8 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Compte de transistor | 189 million | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 128 GB | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | |
Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 |