Intel UHD Graphics P630 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics P630 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics P630
- Environ 39% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1200 MHz versus 863 MHz
- 64x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 128 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2194 versus 1993
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 329 versus 288
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 20.49 versus 8.832
- 2.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.089 versus 0.731
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 24.713 versus 19.952
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz versus 863 MHz |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 128 GB versus 2 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2194 versus 1993 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 329 versus 288 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 20.49 versus 8.832 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.089 versus 0.731 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.713 versus 19.952 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
- 2.4x plus de vitesse du noyau: 850 MHz versus 350 MHz
- 32x plus de pipelines: 768 versus 24
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 7107 versus 5635
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 520.747 versus 387.561
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 43.535 versus 37.743
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3188 versus 2010
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3275 versus 2273
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3333 versus 3019
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3188 versus 2010
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3275 versus 2273
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3333 versus 3019
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 850 MHz versus 350 MHz |
| Pipelines | 768 versus 24 |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7107 versus 5635 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 520.747 versus 387.561 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 43.535 versus 37.743 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3188 versus 2010 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3275 versus 2273 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 versus 3019 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3188 versus 2010 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3275 versus 2273 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 versus 3019 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics P630
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel UHD Graphics P630 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2194 | 1993 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 329 | 288 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5635 | 7107 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 20.49 | 8.832 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 387.561 | 520.747 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.089 | 0.731 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.713 | 19.952 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 37.743 | 43.535 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2010 | 3188 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2273 | 3275 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3019 | 3333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2010 | 3188 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2273 | 3275 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3019 | 3333 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 759 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel UHD Graphics P630 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1072 | 1047 |
| Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
| Architecture | Kepler | |
| Nom de code | GK106 | |
| Date de sortie | 30 May 2013 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz | 863 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 350 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Pipelines | 24 | 768 |
| Noyaux CUDA | 768 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,326 gflops | |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 55.23 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
| Compte de transistor | 2,540 million | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 API |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 128 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 64.0 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
| Verde Drivers | ||
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | |
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Options SLI | 1 | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel UHD Graphics P630 avec des autres
IntelUHD Graphics P630 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6800 Ultra
IntelUHD Graphics P630 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 1400
IntelUHD Graphics P630 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9800 GT
IntelUHD Graphics P630 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K4100M
IntelUHD Graphics P630 vs
IntelIris Graphics 6100
IntelUHD Graphics P630 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M500M
