Intel UHD Graphics versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 mois plus tard
Date de sortie | 21 Aug 2019 versus 30 April 2019 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Environ 39% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1665 MHz versus 1200 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 14 nm
- 5.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 134.765 versus 22.935
- 3.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1316.075 versus 337.37
- 6.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.799 versus 1.338
- 4.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 94.915 versus 19.62
- 19.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 573.418 versus 29.757
- Environ 92% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 564 versus 293
- 5.3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 7881 versus 1493
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse augmenté | 1665 MHz versus 1200 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 14 nm |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 134.765 versus 22.935 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1316.075 versus 337.37 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.799 versus 1.338 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.915 versus 19.62 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 573.418 versus 29.757 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 564 versus 293 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7881 versus 1493 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Nom | Intel UHD Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.935 | 134.765 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 337.37 | 1316.075 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.338 | 8.799 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.62 | 94.915 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.757 | 573.418 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 293 | 564 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1493 | 7881 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39165 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10959 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10959 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 305 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel UHD Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Turing |
Nom de code | Comet Lake GT2 | TU107 |
Date de sortie | 21 Aug 2019 | 30 April 2019 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1167 | 376 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $179 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz | 1665 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 12 nm |
Pipelines | 192 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 28.80 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1485 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compte DisplayPort | 1 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
Vitesse de mémoire | 8000 MHz |