NVIDIA GeForce 710M versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce 710M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 710M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 17% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 297.6 gflops versus 253.4 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- 2.2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 33 Watt
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 2457 versus 2387
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.51 versus 5.055
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 11.718 versus 10.393
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1030 versus 967
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3075 versus 2766
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1030 versus 967
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3075 versus 2766
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 24 July 2013 versus 22 March 2012 |
| Performance á point flottant | 297.6 gflops versus 253.4 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 33 Watt |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2457 versus 2387 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.51 versus 5.055 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.718 versus 10.393 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1030 versus 967 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3075 versus 2766 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1030 versus 967 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3075 versus 2766 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 532 versus 454
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 152 versus 125
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 215.004 versus 148.156
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.635 versus 0.577
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 versus 3325
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 versus 3325
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 532 versus 454 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 152 versus 125 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 215.004 versus 148.156 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.635 versus 0.577 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.903 versus 19.855 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3325 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3325 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 710M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce 710M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 454 | 532 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 125 | 152 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2457 | 2387 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.51 | 5.055 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 148.156 | 215.004 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.577 | 0.635 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.718 | 10.393 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.855 | 19.903 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1030 | 967 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3075 | 2766 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3325 | 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1030 | 967 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3075 | 2766 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3325 | 3359 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce 710M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Fermi |
| Nom de code | GK208 | GF108 |
| Date de sortie | 24 July 2013 | 22 March 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1387 | 1390 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 800 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 719 MHz | |
| Performance á point flottant | 297.6 gflops | 253.4 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 96 | 96 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 12.4 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 33 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 585 million | 585 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 96 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 2560x1600 | |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 2560x1600 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
| HDCP | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | PCI Express 2.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | medium sized |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 API | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| DirectX 11.2 | 12 API | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3\GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | DDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| DirectCompute | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |

