NVIDIA GeForce 930MX versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce 930MX and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 930MX
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 45% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 952 MHz versus 657 MHz
- Environ 55% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1020 MHz versus 657 MHz
- 3.2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 17 Watt versus 55 Watt
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 23.565 versus 15.673
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3577 versus 2728
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 versus 3333
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3577 versus 2728
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 versus 3333
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 March 2016 versus 30 May 2013 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 952 MHz versus 657 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1020 MHz versus 657 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 17 Watt versus 55 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 23.565 versus 15.673 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3577 versus 2728 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 3333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3577 versus 2728 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 3333 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M
- Environ 72% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 42.05 GTexel / s versus 24.48 GTexel / s
- 2x plus de pipelines: 768 versus 384
- Environ 29% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,009 gflops versus 783.4 gflops
- Environ 11% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 2000 MHz versus 1800 MHz
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1720 versus 1289
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 232 versus 194
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 5599 versus 5525
- 3.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 509.958 versus 165.338
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.512 versus 1.09
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2836 versus 2053
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2836 versus 2053
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 42.05 GTexel / s versus 24.48 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 768 versus 384 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,009 gflops versus 783.4 gflops |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz versus 1800 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1720 versus 1289 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 232 versus 194 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5599 versus 5525 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 509.958 versus 165.338 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.512 versus 1.09 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2836 versus 2053 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2836 versus 2053 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 930MX
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce 930MX | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1289 | 1720 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 194 | 232 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5525 | 5599 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 23.565 | 15.673 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 165.338 | 509.958 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.09 | 1.512 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2053 | 2836 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3577 | 2728 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2053 | 2836 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3577 | 2728 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3333 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 495 | 0 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.422 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 53.992 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce 930MX | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Nom de code | GM108 | GK106 |
| Date de sortie | 1 March 2016 | 30 May 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1124 | 1126 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1020 MHz | 657 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 952 MHz | 657 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 783.4 gflops | 1,009 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 768 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 24.48 GTexel / s | 42.05 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 17 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Noyaux CUDA | 768 | |
| Compte de transistor | 2,540 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Options SLI | 1 | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 API |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | 64.0 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce 930MX avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce 930MX vs
NVIDIAQuadro 2000D
NVIDIAGeForce 930MX vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760M
NVIDIAGeForce 930MX vs
IntelHD Graphics 6000
NVIDIAGeForce 930MX vs
AMDRadeon R7 M440
NVIDIAGeForce 930MX vs
AMDRadeon R5 M420
NVIDIAGeForce 930MX vs
AMDRadeon R7 350
