NVIDIA GeForce 930MX vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 930MX and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 930MX

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
• Around 45% higher core clock speed: 952 MHz vs 657 MHz
• Around 55% higher boost clock speed: 1020 MHz vs 657 MHz
• 3.2x lower typical power consumption: 17 Watt vs 55 Watt
• Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 23.565 vs 15.673
• Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3577 vs 2728
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 3333
• Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3577 vs 2728
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 3333

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M

• Around 72% higher texture fill rate: 42.05 GTexel / s vs 24.48 GTexel / s
• 2x more pipelines: 768 vs 384
• Around 29% better floating-point performance: 1,009 gflops vs 783.4 gflops
• Around 11% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
• Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1720 vs 1289
• Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 232 vs 194
• Around 1% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5599 vs 5525
• 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 509.958 vs 165.338
• Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.512 vs 1.09
• Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2836 vs 2053
• Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2836 vs 2053

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 930MX
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1289 1720
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	194 232
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	5525 5599
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	23.565 15.673
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	165.338 509.958
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.09 1.512
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2053 2836
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3577 2728
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3333
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2053 2836
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3577 2728
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3333

Compare specifications (specs)