NVIDIA GeForce 940M versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce 940M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 940M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 24% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 28.22 GTexel / s versus 22.7 billion / sec
- Environ 66% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 903.2 gflops versus 544.5 gflops
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1127 versus 936
- 2.2x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 5982 versus 2683
- 3.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 25.98 versus 8.493
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.307 versus 0.863
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 21.837 versus 17.242
- 5.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 101.399 versus 19.116
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2132 versus 1913
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2132 versus 1913
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 13 March 2015 versus 1 October 2012 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 28.22 GTexel / s versus 22.7 billion / sec |
| Performance á point flottant | 903.2 gflops versus 544.5 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1127 versus 936 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5982 versus 2683 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.98 versus 8.493 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.307 versus 0.863 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.837 versus 17.242 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 101.399 versus 19.116 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2132 versus 1913 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 3341 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2132 versus 1913 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 3341 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M
- Environ 3% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 32 Watt versus 33 Watt
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 164 versus 154
- Environ 69% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 285.42 versus 168.449
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3670 versus 3065
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3670 versus 3065
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 32 Watt versus 33 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 164 versus 154 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 285.42 versus 168.449 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3670 versus 3065 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3670 versus 3065 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 940M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce 940M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1127 | 936 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 154 | 164 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5982 | 2683 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.98 | 8.493 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 168.449 | 285.42 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.307 | 0.863 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.837 | 17.242 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 101.399 | 19.116 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2132 | 1913 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3065 | 3670 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3341 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2132 | 1913 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3065 | 3670 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3341 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 506 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce 940M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Nom de code | GM108 | GK107 |
| Date de sortie | 13 March 2015 | 1 October 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1184 | 1187 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1176 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1072 MHz | |
| Performance á point flottant | 903.2 gflops | 544.5 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 28.22 GTexel / s | 22.7 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 32 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | 1,270 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 384 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | medium sized |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 API |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 128bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3\GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| DirectCompute | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce 940M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce 940M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 645M
NVIDIAGeForce 940M vs
AMDRadeon R6 M255DX
NVIDIAGeForce 940M vs
AMDFirePro W2100
NVIDIAGeForce 940M vs
AMDRadeon R8 M350DX
NVIDIAGeForce 940M vs
AMDRadeon R5 M430
NVIDIAGeForce 940M vs
AMDRadeon E9171 MCM
