NVIDIA GeForce 940MX versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce 940MX and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 96% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 23 Watt versus 45 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 28 June 2016 versus 12 March 2014 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt versus 45 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 3353 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M
- Environ 51% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 36.08 GTexel / s versus 23.83 GTexel / s
- Environ 67% de pipelines plus haut: 640 versus 384
- Environ 51% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,155 gflops versus 762.6 gflops
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2521 versus 1516
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 225 versus 172
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 9809 versus 6325
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 37.761 versus 28.91
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 388.248 versus 312.94
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.428 versus 1.83
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 38.889 versus 27.833
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 151.016 versus 103.937
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3817 versus 2486
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3685 versus 3587
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3817 versus 2486
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3685 versus 3587
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 979 versus 585
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 36.08 GTexel / s versus 23.83 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 640 versus 384 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,155 gflops versus 762.6 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2521 versus 1516 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 225 versus 172 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9809 versus 6325 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.761 versus 28.91 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 388.248 versus 312.94 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.428 versus 1.83 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.889 versus 27.833 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 151.016 versus 103.937 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3817 versus 2486 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 versus 3587 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3817 versus 2486 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 versus 3587 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 979 versus 585 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce 940MX | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1516 | 2521 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 172 | 225 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6325 | 9809 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.91 | 37.761 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 312.94 | 388.248 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.83 | 2.428 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.833 | 38.889 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 103.937 | 151.016 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2486 | 3817 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3587 | 3685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2486 | 3817 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3587 | 3685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3353 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 585 | 979 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce 940MX | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell |
| Nom de code | GM108 | GM107 |
| Date de sortie | 28 June 2016 | 12 March 2014 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1071 | 896 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 993 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 954 MHz | |
| Performance á point flottant | 762.6 gflops | 1,155 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 23.83 GTexel / s | 36.08 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | 1,870 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 640 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | medium sized |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 40.1 GB / s | 80.0 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3, GDDR5 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | DDR3 or GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Ansel | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce 940MX avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce 940MX vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX 5600 XT
NVIDIAGeForce 940MX vs
ATIMobility Radeon 9600 PRO
NVIDIAGeForce 940MX vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 2500M
NVIDIAGeForce 940MX vs
NVIDIAQuadro K4100M
NVIDIAGeForce 940MX vs
AMDRadeon R5 A330
NVIDIAGeForce 940MX vs
AMDRadeon R6 M340DX
