NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 7 mois plus tard
- Environ 4% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1120 MHz versus 1080 MHz
- Environ 33% de pipelines plus haut: 96 versus 72
- Environ 38% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 215.04 gflops versus 155.52 gflops
- Environ 22% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 23 Watt versus 28 Watt
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 523 versus 379
- 5.6x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 174 versus 31
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 3 September 2010 versus 7 January 2010 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1120 MHz versus 1080 MHz |
| Pipelines | 96 versus 72 |
| Performance á point flottant | 215.04 gflops versus 155.52 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt versus 28 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 523 versus 379 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 174 versus 31 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M
- Environ 61% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 10.8 GTexel / s versus 6.7 billion / sec
- 3.9x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 7386 versus 1875
- 3.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2120 versus 690
- 3.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2120 versus 690
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 10.8 GTexel / s versus 6.7 billion / sec |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7386 versus 1875 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2120 versus 690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2120 versus 690 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 523 | 379 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 174 | 31 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1875 | 7386 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.184 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 172.058 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.459 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.145 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 13.944 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 859 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 719 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 690 | 2120 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 859 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 719 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 690 | 2120 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Fermi | Tesla 2.0 |
| Nom de code | GF108 | GT215 |
| Date de sortie | 3 September 2010 | 7 January 2010 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1563 | 1565 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 1120 MHz | 1080 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 96 | 72 |
| Performance á point flottant | 215.04 gflops | 155.52 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 96 | 72 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 6.7 billion / sec | 10.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt | 28 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 585 million | 727 million |
| Gigaflops | 233 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | Single Link DVIVGADisplayPortHDMIDual Link DVI |
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | medium sized |
| Soutien de bus | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 API | 10.1 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.1 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 25.6 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 800 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3, GDDR3 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectCompute | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| Optimus | ||
| HybridPower | ||
| MXM 3.0 Type-B | ||
| Power management | 8.0 | |
| PowerMizer 8.0 | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GT 425M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 240M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 425M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 335M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 425M vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 5145
NVIDIAGeForce GT 425M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 520M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 425M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 410M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 425M vs
AMDRadeon HD 6410D IGP
