NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 610
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 0 mois plus tard
- 4x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 29 Watt versus 116 Watt
Date de sortie | 2 April 2012 versus 15 March 2011 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 29 Watt versus 116 Watt |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
- 2.2x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1800 MHz versus 810 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 28.8 billion / sec versus 6.5 billion / sec
- 4x plus de pipelines: 192 versus 48
- 4.4x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 691.2 gflops versus 155.5 gflops
- 1026x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 1026 MHz versus 1.8 GB/s
- 4.8x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1557 versus 322
- 2.9x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 382 versus 131
- 4.5x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 5750 versus 1283
- 7.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 18.461 versus 2.471
- 4.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 354.392 versus 77.99
- 4.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.125 versus 0.233
- 3.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 18.511 versus 6.018
- 10.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 41.941 versus 4.053
- 4.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2488 versus 555
- 4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3351 versus 835
- 2.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3322 versus 1155
- 4.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2488 versus 555
- 4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3351 versus 835
- 2.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3322 versus 1155
- 3.7x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 322 versus 87
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1800 MHz versus 810 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 28.8 billion / sec versus 6.5 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 192 versus 48 |
Performance á point flottant | 691.2 gflops versus 155.5 gflops |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1026 MHz versus 1.8 GB/s |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1557 versus 322 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 382 versus 131 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5750 versus 1283 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.461 versus 2.471 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 354.392 versus 77.99 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.125 versus 0.233 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.511 versus 6.018 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 41.941 versus 4.053 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2488 versus 555 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3351 versus 835 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3322 versus 1155 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2488 versus 555 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3351 versus 835 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3322 versus 1155 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 322 versus 87 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 610
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 322 | 1557 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 131 | 382 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1283 | 5750 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.471 | 18.461 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 77.99 | 354.392 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.233 | 1.125 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.018 | 18.511 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.053 | 41.941 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 555 | 2488 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 835 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1155 | 3322 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 555 | 2488 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 835 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1155 | 3322 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 87 | 322 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Nom de code | GF119 | GF116 |
Date de sortie | 2 April 2012 | 15 March 2011 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $39.99 | $149 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1626 | 1019 |
Prix maintenant | $39.99 | $287.59 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 10.13 | 7.49 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 810 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Noyaux CUDA | 48 | 192 |
Performance á point flottant | 155.5 gflops | 691.2 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Température maximale du GPU | 102 °C | 100 °C |
Pipelines | 48 | 192 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 6.5 billion / sec | 28.8 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 29 Watt | 116 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 292 million | 1,170 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | Internal |
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI, VGA | Two Dual Link DVI-IMini HDMI, 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | 16x PCI-E 2.0 |
Hauteur | 2.7" (6.9 cm) | 4.376" (11.1 cm) |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 8.25" (21 cm) |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | One 6-pin |
Options SLI | 2-way | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.2 | 4.2 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1024 MB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | 98.4 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 192 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1.8 GB/s | 1026 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
CUDA | ||
3D Vision | ||
DSR | ||
SLI |