NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 versus AMD Radeon HD 6450
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 and AMD Radeon HD 6450 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 610
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 0 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 30% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 6.5 billion / sec versus 5 GTexel / s
- Environ 3% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 29 Watt versus 30 Watt
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 312 versus 197
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 129 versus 119
- 2x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 1281 versus 639
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 2.471 versus 1.878
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.233 versus 0.231
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 6.018 versus 4.982
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 555 versus 497
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 835 versus 810
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 555 versus 497
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 835 versus 810
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 2 April 2012 versus 7 April 2011 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 6.5 billion / sec versus 5 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 29 Watt versus 30 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 312 versus 197 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 129 versus 119 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1281 versus 639 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.471 versus 1.878 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.233 versus 0.231 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.018 versus 4.982 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 555 versus 497 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 835 versus 810 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 555 versus 497 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 835 versus 810 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 6450
- 3.3x plus de pipelines: 160 versus 48
- Environ 29% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 200.0 gflops versus 155.5 gflops
- 800x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 800 MHz versus 1.8 GB/s
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 97.327 versus 77.99
- 4.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 19.314 versus 4.053
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1627 versus 1155
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1627 versus 1155
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 160 versus 48 |
Performance á point flottant | 200.0 gflops versus 155.5 gflops |
Vitesse de mémoire | 800 MHz versus 1.8 GB/s |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 97.327 versus 77.99 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.314 versus 4.053 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1627 versus 1155 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1627 versus 1155 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 610
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6450
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 | AMD Radeon HD 6450 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 312 | 197 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 129 | 119 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1281 | 639 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.471 | 1.878 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 77.99 | 97.327 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.233 | 0.231 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.018 | 4.982 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.053 | 19.314 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 555 | 497 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 835 | 810 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1155 | 1627 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 555 | 497 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 835 | 810 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1155 | 1627 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 87 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 | AMD Radeon HD 6450 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Nom de code | GF119 | Caicos |
Date de sortie | 2 April 2012 | 7 April 2011 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $39.99 | $55 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1627 | 1628 |
Prix maintenant | $39.99 | $39.99 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 10.13 | 9.02 |
Conception | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 810 MHz | |
Noyaux CUDA | 48 | |
Performance á point flottant | 155.5 gflops | 200.0 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Température maximale du GPU | 102 °C | |
Pipelines | 48 | 160 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 6.5 billion / sec | 5 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 29 Watt | 30 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 292 million | 370 million |
Vitesse augmenté | 750 MHz | |
Stream Processors | 160 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI, VGA | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Eyefinity | ||
Nombre d’écrans Eyefinity | 4 | |
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 x8 |
Hauteur | 2.7" (6.9 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 168 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.2 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1024 MB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | 8.5-12.8 GB/x (DDR3) or 25.6-28.8 GB/s (GDDR5) |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1.8 GB/s | 800 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
CUDA | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire |