NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 versus Intel HD Graphics 4000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 and Intel HD Graphics 4000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 630
- Environ 25% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 810 MHz versus 650 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 12.96 GTexel / s versus 4.2 GTexel / s
- 6x plus de pipelines: 96 versus 16
- 9.3x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 311.0 gflops versus 33.6 gflops
- Environ 96% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 681 versus 347
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 225 versus 194
- 4.6x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 2473 versus 538
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 9.613 versus 7.36
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 12.49 versus 12.009
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1151 versus 754
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1853 versus 1492
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1151 versus 754
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1853 versus 1492
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 810 MHz versus 650 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 12.96 GTexel / s versus 4.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 96 versus 16 |
Performance á point flottant | 311.0 gflops versus 33.6 gflops |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 681 versus 347 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 225 versus 194 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2473 versus 538 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 9.613 versus 7.36 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.49 versus 12.009 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1151 versus 754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1853 versus 1492 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1151 versus 754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1853 versus 1492 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 4000
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 22 nm versus 40 nm
- Environ 44% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 45 Watt versus 65 Watt
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.712 versus 6.498
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 155.638 versus 140.06
- Environ 85% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.931 versus 0.502
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2392 versus 2073
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2392 versus 2073
Caractéristiques | |
Processus de fabrication | 22 nm versus 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt versus 65 Watt |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.712 versus 6.498 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 155.638 versus 140.06 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.931 versus 0.502 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2392 versus 2073 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2392 versus 2073 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 630
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 | Intel HD Graphics 4000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 681 | 347 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 225 | 194 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2473 | 538 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.498 | 8.712 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 140.06 | 155.638 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.502 | 0.931 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 9.613 | 7.36 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.49 | 12.009 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1151 | 754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1853 | 1492 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2073 | 2392 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1151 | 754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1853 | 1492 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2073 | 2392 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 170 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 | Intel HD Graphics 4000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Fermi | Generation 7.0 |
Nom de code | GF108 | Ivy Bridge GT2 |
Date de sortie | 15 May 2012 | 14 May 2012 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $99.99 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1440 | 1501 |
Prix maintenant | $99.21 | |
Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 8.89 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 810 MHz | 650 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 311.0 gflops | 33.6 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 22 nm |
Pipelines | 96 | 16 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 12.96 GTexel / s | 4.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 45 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 585 million | 1,200 million |
Vitesse augmenté | 1050 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Longeur | 145 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.1 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.0 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 28.8 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | |
Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |