NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M versus NVIDIA GeForce GTS 350M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 350M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 6% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 253.4 gflops versus 240 gflops
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 536 versus 381
- 2.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 151 versus 69
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 versus 3123
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 versus 3123
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 22 March 2012 versus 7 January 2010 |
| Performance á point flottant | 253.4 gflops versus 240 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 536 versus 381 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 151 versus 69 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3123 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3123 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTS 350M
- Environ 18% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 28 Watt versus 33 Watt
- 3.4x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 8210 versus 2407
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 28 Watt versus 33 Watt |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8210 versus 2407 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 350M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 350M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 536 | 381 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 151 | 69 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2407 | 8210 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.055 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 215.004 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.635 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.393 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.903 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 967 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2766 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3123 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 967 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2766 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3123 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 350M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Fermi | Tesla 2.0 |
| Nom de code | GF108 | GT215 |
| Date de sortie | 22 March 2012 | 7 January 2010 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1407 | 1410 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Noyaux CUDA | 96 | 96 |
| Performance á point flottant | 253.4 gflops | 240 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 96 | 96 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 28 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 585 million | 727 million |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1249 MHz | |
| Gigaflops | 360 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 16 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | DisplayPortLVDSHDMIDual Link DVISingle Link DVIVGA |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | Up to 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | PCI-E 2.0 |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | MXM-II |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | large |
| MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
| Options SLI | 2-way | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
| DirectX 11.2 | 12 API | |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.1 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3\GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 51.2 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectCompute | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| Optimus | ||
| HybridPower | ||
| MXM 3.0 Type-B | ||
| Power management | 8.0 | |
| PowerMizer 8.0 | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GT 630M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTS 350M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 630M vs
ATIFirePro V3800
NVIDIAGeForce GT 630M vs
AMDFirePro M8900
NVIDIAGeForce GT 630M vs
NVIDIAQuadro K1000M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 630M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 625 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GT 630M vs
AMDRadeon HD 8550G
