NVIDIA Quadro K1000M versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M

Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro K1000M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro K1000M

versus

NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K1000M

La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 mois plus tard
2x plus de pipelines: 192 versus 96
Environ 29% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 326.4 gflops versus 253.4 gflops
Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
Environ 45% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 779 versus 538
Environ 67% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 250 versus 150
Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1162 versus 967
Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1162 versus 967

Caractéristiques
Date de sortie	1 June 2012 versus 22 March 2012
Pipelines	192 versus 96
Performance á point flottant	326.4 gflops versus 253.4 gflops
Processus de fabrication	28 nm versus 40 nm
Taille de mémore maximale	2 GB versus 1 GB
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark	779 versus 538
PassMark - G2D Mark	250 versus 150
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1162 versus 967
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1162 versus 967

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M

Environ 36% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 33 Watt versus 45 Watt
Environ 40% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 2398 versus 1717
Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 5.055 versus 4.636
Environ 86% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 215.004 versus 115.549
Environ 40% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.635 versus 0.454
Environ 48% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 10.393 versus 7.024
Environ 90% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 19.903 versus 10.485
Environ 63% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2766 versus 1695
Environ 46% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 versus 2297
Environ 63% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2766 versus 1695
Environ 46% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 versus 2297

Caractéristiques
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	33 Watt versus 45 Watt
Référence
Geekbench - OpenCL	2398 versus 1717
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	5.055 versus 4.636
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	215.004 versus 115.549
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.635 versus 0.454
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	10.393 versus 7.024
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	19.903 versus 10.485
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2766 versus 1695
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3359 versus 2297
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2766 versus 1695
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3359 versus 2297

Comparer les références

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K1000M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

779

538

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

250

150

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

1717

2398

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4.636

5.055

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

115.549

215.004

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

0.454

0.635

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

7.024

10.393

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

10.485

19.903

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1162

967

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1695

2766

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2297

3359

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1162

967

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1695

2766

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2297

3359

Nom	NVIDIA Quadro K1000M	NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
PassMark - G3D Mark	779	538
PassMark - G2D Mark	250	150
Geekbench - OpenCL	1717	2398
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	4.636	5.055
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	115.549	215.004
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.454	0.635
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	7.024	10.393
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	10.485	19.903
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1162	967
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1695	2766
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2297	3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1162	967
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1695	2766
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2297	3359
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		0

Comparer les caractéristiques

	NVIDIA Quadro K1000M	NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
Essentiel
Architecture	Kepler	Fermi
Nom de code	GK107	GF108
Date de sortie	1 June 2012	22 March 2012
Prix de sortie (MSRP)	$119.90
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	1402	1403
Prix maintenant	$149.90
Genre	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Valeur pour le prix (0-100)	6.18
Infos techniques
Vitesse du noyau	850 MHz
Performance á point flottant	326.4 gflops	253.4 gflops
Processus de fabrication	28 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	192	96
Taux de remplissage de la texture	13.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	45 Watt	33 Watt
Compte de transistor	1,270 million	585 million
Noyaux CUDA		96
Sorties et ports de vidéo
Connecteurs d’écran	No outputs	No outputs
HDCP
HDMI
Résolution VGA maximale		Up to 2048x1536
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	MXM-A (3.0)
Taille du laptop	medium sized	medium sized
Soutien de bus		PCI Express 2.0
Soutien API
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Vulkan
DirectX 11.2		12 API
OpenCL		1.1
Mémoire
RAM maximale	2 GB	1 GB
Bande passante de la mémoire	28.8 GB / s
Largeur du bus mémoire	128 Bit
Vitesse de mémoire	1800 MHz	1800 MHz
Genre de mémoire	DDR3	DDR3\GDDR5
Mémoire partagé	0	0
Technologies
3D Blu-Ray
3D Vision
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
CUDA
DirectCompute
DirectX 11		DirectX 11
Optimus