NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM versus AMD Radeon HD 6630M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM and AMD Radeon HD 6630M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 59% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 797 MHz versus 500 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 25.5 GTexel / s versus 12 GTexel / s
- Environ 28% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 612.1 gflops versus 480.0 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 11% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1782 MHz versus 1600 MHz
- 3.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 9.932 versus 2.847
- Environ 78% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 254.345 versus 142.549
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 13.613 versus 9.527
- 3.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1502 versus 424
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2167 versus 1055
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3334 versus 2368
- 3.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1502 versus 424
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2167 versus 1055
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3334 versus 2368
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 24 April 2012 versus 4 January 2011 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 797 MHz versus 500 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 25.5 GTexel / s versus 12 GTexel / s |
| Performance á point flottant | 612.1 gflops versus 480.0 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1782 MHz versus 1600 MHz |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.932 versus 2.847 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 254.345 versus 142.549 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.613 versus 9.527 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1502 versus 424 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2167 versus 1055 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3334 versus 2368 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1502 versus 424 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2167 versus 1055 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3334 versus 2368 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 6630M
- Environ 25% de pipelines plus haut: 480 versus 384
- Environ 92% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 26 Watt versus 50 Watt
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 42.818 versus 15.32
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 480 versus 384 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 26 Watt versus 50 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 42.818 versus 15.32 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6630M
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM | AMD Radeon HD 6630M |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.932 | 2.847 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 254.345 | 142.549 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.14 | 0 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.613 | 9.527 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 15.32 | 42.818 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1502 | 424 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2167 | 1055 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3334 | 2368 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1502 | 424 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2167 | 1055 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3334 | 2368 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 685 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 390 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 984 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM | AMD Radeon HD 6630M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
| Nom de code | GK107 | Whistler |
| Date de sortie | 24 April 2012 | 4 January 2011 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1368 | 1370 |
| Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 797 MHz | 500 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 612.1 gflops | 480.0 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 480 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 25.5 GTexel / s | 12 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 26 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,270 million | 716 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 145 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 28.51 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1782 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 OEM vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 5750
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 OEM vs
AMDRadeon HD 6630M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 OEM vs
ATIRadeon HD 5570
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 OEM vs
NVIDIAQuadro K600
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 820M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 OEM vs
AMDRadeon R5 M255
