NVIDIA Quadro K600 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro K600 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K600
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 10 mois plus tard
- Environ 10% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 876 MHz versus 797 MHz
- Environ 22% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 41 Watt versus 50 Watt
| Date de sortie | 1 March 2013 versus 24 April 2012 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 876 MHz versus 797 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 41 Watt versus 50 Watt |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM
- Environ 82% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 25.5 GTexel / s versus 14.02 GTexel / s
- 2x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 192
- Environ 82% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 612.1 gflops versus 336.4 gflops
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 9.932 versus 6.367
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 254.345 versus 118.389
- 2.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.14 versus 0.396
- Environ 72% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 13.613 versus 7.921
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 15.32 versus 9.393
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1502 versus 1227
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2167 versus 1745
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3334 versus 2261
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1502 versus 1227
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2167 versus 1745
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3334 versus 2261
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 25.5 GTexel / s versus 14.02 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 384 versus 192 |
| Performance á point flottant | 612.1 gflops versus 336.4 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.932 versus 6.367 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 254.345 versus 118.389 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.14 versus 0.396 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.613 versus 7.921 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 15.32 versus 9.393 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1502 versus 1227 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2167 versus 1745 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3334 versus 2261 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1502 versus 1227 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2167 versus 1745 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3334 versus 2261 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro K600 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 728 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 278 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1830 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.367 | 9.932 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 118.389 | 254.345 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.396 | 1.14 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.921 | 13.613 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 9.393 | 15.32 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1227 | 1502 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1745 | 2167 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2261 | 3334 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1227 | 1502 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1745 | 2167 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2261 | 3334 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro K600 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Nom de code | GK107 | GK107 |
| Date de sortie | 1 March 2013 | 24 April 2012 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $199 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1367 | 1368 |
| Prix maintenant | $78.99 | |
| Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 11.66 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 876 MHz | 797 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 336.4 gflops | 612.1 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 192 | 384 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 14.02 GTexel / s | 25.5 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 41 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,270 million | 1,270 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 160 mm | 145 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 28.51 GB / s | 28.51 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1782 MHz | 1782 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro K600 avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro K600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9800M GTX
NVIDIAQuadro K600 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6630M
NVIDIAQuadro K600 vs
ATIRadeon HD 5570
NVIDIAQuadro K600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 OEM
NVIDIAQuadro K600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 820M
NVIDIAQuadro K600 vs
AMDRadeon R5 M255
