NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 versus NVIDIA Quadro K2000M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 and NVIDIA Quadro K2000M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 0 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 40% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1046 MHz versus 745 MHz
- Environ 40% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 803.3 gflops versus 572.2 gflops
- Environ 12% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 49 Watt versus 55 Watt
- 2.8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5008 MHz versus 1800 MHz
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 10.475 versus 8.142
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2309 versus 1726
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3354 versus 2207
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2309 versus 1726
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3354 versus 2207
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 29 May 2013 versus 1 June 2012 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1046 MHz versus 745 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 803.3 gflops versus 572.2 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt versus 55 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5008 MHz versus 1800 MHz |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.475 versus 8.142 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2309 versus 1726 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3354 versus 2207 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2309 versus 1726 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3354 versus 2207 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K2000M
- Environ 42% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 23.84 GTexel / s versus 16.74 GTexel / s
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 262.321 versus 173.537
- 23.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.741 versus 0.032
- Environ 90% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 16.571 versus 8.717
- Environ 76% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 18.406 versus 10.454
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 versus 3220
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 versus 3220
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 23.84 GTexel / s versus 16.74 GTexel / s |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 262.321 versus 173.537 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.741 versus 0.032 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 16.571 versus 8.717 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 18.406 versus 10.454 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 versus 3220 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 versus 3220 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K2000M
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 | NVIDIA Quadro K2000M |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.475 | 8.142 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 173.537 | 262.321 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.032 | 0.741 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.717 | 16.571 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 10.454 | 18.406 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2309 | 1726 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3354 | 2207 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3220 | 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2309 | 1726 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3354 | 2207 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3220 | 3351 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1012 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 255 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2860 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 | NVIDIA Quadro K2000M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | GK208 | GK107 |
| Date de sortie | 29 May 2013 | 1 June 2012 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $89 | $265.27 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1250 | 1251 |
| Genre | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Prix maintenant | $149.95 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 8.53 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 1046 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 803.3 gflops | 572.2 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 16.74 GTexel / s | 23.84 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,270 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x8 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Longeur | 145 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 40.06 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5008 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7570
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7620G IGP
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K2000M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 vs
NVIDIAGRID K180Q
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 vs
NVIDIAGRID M3-3020
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 vs
AMDRadeon 620
