NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 620
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 10 mois plus tard
- Environ 36% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 954 MHz versus 700 MHz
- Environ 36% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 15.26 GTexel / s versus 11.2 billion / sec
- 2x plus de pipelines: 192 versus 96
- Environ 36% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 366.3 gflops versus 268.8 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- 2.6x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 19 Watt versus 49 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 623 versus 383
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 212 versus 158
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 1946 versus 1571
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.705 versus 4.046
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 100.391 versus 83.907
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.441 versus 0.371
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 8.146 versus 6.791
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 20.64 versus 17.41
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 977 versus 614
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1494 versus 1162
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1833 versus 1683
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 977 versus 614
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1494 versus 1162
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1833 versus 1683
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 27 March 2014 versus 15 May 2012 |
Vitesse du noyau | 954 MHz versus 700 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 15.26 GTexel / s versus 11.2 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 192 versus 96 |
Performance á point flottant | 366.3 gflops versus 268.8 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt versus 49 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 623 versus 383 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 212 versus 158 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1946 versus 1571 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.705 versus 4.046 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 100.391 versus 83.907 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.441 versus 0.371 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.146 versus 6.791 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 20.64 versus 17.41 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 977 versus 614 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1494 versus 1162 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1833 versus 1683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 977 versus 614 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1494 versus 1162 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1833 versus 1683 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 620
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 623 | 383 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 212 | 158 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1946 | 1571 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.705 | 4.046 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 100.391 | 83.907 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.441 | 0.371 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.146 | 6.791 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 20.64 | 17.41 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 977 | 614 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1494 | 1162 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1833 | 1683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 977 | 614 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1494 | 1162 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1833 | 1683 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 192 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Fermi |
Nom de code | GK208B | GF108 |
Date de sortie | 27 March 2014 | 15 May 2012 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $34.99 | $39.99 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1488 | 1554 |
Prix maintenant | $34.99 | $39.99 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 23.15 | 13.32 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 954 MHz | 700 MHz |
Noyaux CUDA | 192 | 96 |
Performance á point flottant | 366.3 gflops | 268.8 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Température maximale du GPU | 95 °C | 98 °C |
Pipelines | 192 | 96 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 15.26 GTexel / s | 11.2 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt | 49 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 292 million | 585 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | Internal |
Connecteurs d’écran | Dual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI, VGA |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | PCI Express 2.0 |
Hauteur | 2.713" (6.9 cm) | 2.7" (6.9 cm) |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 5.7" (14.5 cm) |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1.8 GB/s | 1.8 GB/s |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
PhysX | ||
PureVideo | ||
3D Blu-Ray |