NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 versus Intel HD Graphics 4000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 and Intel HD Graphics 4000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 8% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 700 MHz versus 650 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 14.43 GTexel / s versus 4.2 GTexel / s
- 24x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 16
- 20.6x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 692.7 gflops versus 33.6 gflops
- 2.4x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 830 versus 347
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 253 versus 194
- 5.4x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 2902 versus 538
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 10.872 versus 8.712
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 166.832 versus 155.638
- Environ 69% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 12.415 versus 7.36
- 3.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 36.916 versus 12.009
- 2.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1951 versus 754
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1693 versus 1492
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3324 versus 2392
- 2.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1951 versus 754
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1693 versus 1492
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3324 versus 2392
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 18 June 2014 versus 14 May 2012 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 700 MHz versus 650 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 14.43 GTexel / s versus 4.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 384 versus 16 |
| Performance á point flottant | 692.7 gflops versus 33.6 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 830 versus 347 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 253 versus 194 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2902 versus 538 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.872 versus 8.712 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 166.832 versus 155.638 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.415 versus 7.36 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 36.916 versus 12.009 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1951 versus 754 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1693 versus 1492 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3324 versus 2392 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1951 versus 754 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1693 versus 1492 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3324 versus 2392 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 4000
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 22 nm versus 40 nm
- Environ 9% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 45 Watt versus 49 Watt
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.931 versus 0.817
| Caractéristiques | |
| Processus de fabrication | 22 nm versus 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt versus 49 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.931 versus 0.817 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | Intel HD Graphics 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 830 | 347 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 253 | 194 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2902 | 538 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.872 | 8.712 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 166.832 | 155.638 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.817 | 0.931 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.415 | 7.36 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 36.916 | 12.009 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1951 | 754 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1693 | 1492 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3324 | 2392 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1951 | 754 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1693 | 1492 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3324 | 2392 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 327 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | Intel HD Graphics 4000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Fermi | Generation 7.0 |
| Nom de code | GF108 | Ivy Bridge GT2 |
| Date de sortie | 18 June 2014 | 14 May 2012 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $59.99 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1311 | 1501 |
| Prix maintenant | $54.99 | |
| Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 20.48 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 700 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 692.7 gflops | 33.6 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 22 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 16 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 14.43 GTexel / s | 4.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 585 million | 1,200 million |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1050 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 145 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.1 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.0 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 40.1 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1600 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GT 730 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 1700M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 730 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 4800
NVIDIAGeForce GT 730 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7600G
NVIDIAGeForce GT 730 vs
AMDRadeon R8 M435DX
NVIDIAGeForce GT 730 vs
AMDRadeon Vega 6 Mobile Efficient
NVIDIAGeForce GT 730 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 5
