NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M versus AMD Radeon HD 8750M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M and AMD Radeon HD 8750M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 31% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 810 MHz versus 620 MHz
- Environ 26% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 980 MHz versus 775 MHz
- Environ 26% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 752.6 gflops versus 595.2 gflops
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 9.392 versus 8.274
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3235 versus 2221
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3235 versus 2221
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 April 2013 versus 26 February 2013 |
Vitesse du noyau | 810 MHz versus 620 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 980 MHz versus 775 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 752.6 gflops versus 595.2 gflops |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.392 versus 8.274 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3235 versus 2221 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3235 versus 2221 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 8750M
- Environ 19% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 18.6 GTexel / s versus 15.68 GTexel / s
- 2.2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 4000 MHz versus 1802 MHz
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1018 versus 794
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 200 versus 149
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 5884 versus 3861
- Environ 72% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 271.177 versus 157.479
- Environ 74% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.505 versus 0.864
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 24.834 versus 16.101
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 70.596 versus 44.77
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1734 versus 1589
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1734 versus 1589
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 18.6 GTexel / s versus 15.68 GTexel / s |
Vitesse de mémoire | 4000 MHz versus 1802 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1018 versus 794 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 200 versus 149 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5884 versus 3861 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 271.177 versus 157.479 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.505 versus 0.864 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.834 versus 16.101 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 70.596 versus 44.77 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1734 versus 1589 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 versus 3339 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1734 versus 1589 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 versus 3339 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8750M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M | AMD Radeon HD 8750M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 794 | 1018 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 149 | 200 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3861 | 5884 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.392 | 8.274 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 157.479 | 271.177 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.864 | 1.505 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 16.101 | 24.834 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 44.77 | 70.596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1589 | 1734 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3235 | 2221 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3339 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1589 | 1734 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3235 | 2221 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3339 | 3351 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 345 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M | AMD Radeon HD 8750M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
Nom de code | GK107 | Mars |
Date de sortie | 1 April 2013 | 26 February 2013 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1303 | 1304 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Conception | AMD Radeon HD 8000M Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 980 MHz | 775 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 810 MHz | 620 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 752.6 gflops | 595.2 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 15.68 GTexel / s | 18.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | |
Compte de transistor | 1,270 million | 1,040 million |
Unités de Compute | 6 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | medium sized |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 11 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | 64 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1802 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Configuration standard de la mémoire | DDR3 / GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus |