NVIDIA Quadro K610M versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro K610M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K610M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 21% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 980 MHz versus 810 MHz
- Environ 50% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 30 Watt versus 45 Watt
- Environ 44% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 2600 MHz versus 1802 MHz
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 218 versus 149
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 182.093 versus 157.479
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 23 July 2013 versus 1 April 2013 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 980 MHz versus 810 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt versus 45 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2600 MHz versus 1802 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 218 versus 149 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 182.093 versus 157.479 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
- 2x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 192
- 2x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 752.6 gflops versus 376.3 gflops
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 793 versus 713
- Environ 94% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 3866 versus 1995
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 44.77 versus 20.881
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1589 versus 1123
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3235 versus 2253
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3339 versus 3195
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1589 versus 1123
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3235 versus 2253
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3339 versus 3195
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 384 versus 192 |
| Performance á point flottant | 752.6 gflops versus 376.3 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 793 versus 713 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3866 versus 1995 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 44.77 versus 20.881 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1589 versus 1123 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3235 versus 2253 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3339 versus 3195 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1589 versus 1123 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3235 versus 2253 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3339 versus 3195 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K610M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro K610M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 713 | 793 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 218 | 149 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1995 | 3866 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 182.093 | 157.479 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0 | 0.864 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 20.881 | 44.77 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1123 | 1589 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2253 | 3235 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3195 | 3339 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1123 | 1589 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2253 | 3235 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3195 | 3339 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.392 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 16.101 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 345 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro K610M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | GK208 | GK107 |
| Date de sortie | 23 July 2013 | 1 April 2013 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $229.99 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1300 | 1301 |
| Prix maintenant | $75 | |
| Genre | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 11.43 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 980 MHz | 810 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 376.3 gflops | 752.6 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 192 | 384 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 15.68 GTexel / s | 15.68 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1270 Million | 1,270 million |
| Vitesse augmenté | 980 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | medium sized |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 API |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 20.8 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2600 MHz | 1802 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | DDR3 / GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
