NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M versus NVIDIA Quadro 4000M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M and NVIDIA Quadro 4000M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 71% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 810 MHz versus 475 MHz
- Environ 14% de pipelines plus haut: 384 versus 336
- Environ 18% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 752.6 gflops versus 638.4 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- 2.2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 45 Watt versus 100 Watt
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1589 versus 1413
- 3.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3235 versus 865
- 2.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3339 versus 1254
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1589 versus 1413
- 3.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3235 versus 865
- 2.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3339 versus 1254
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 April 2013 versus 22 February 2011 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 810 MHz versus 475 MHz |
| Pipelines | 384 versus 336 |
| Performance á point flottant | 752.6 gflops versus 638.4 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt versus 100 Watt |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1589 versus 1413 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3235 versus 865 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3339 versus 1254 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1589 versus 1413 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3235 versus 865 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3339 versus 1254 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro 4000M
- Environ 70% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 26.6 GTexel / s versus 15.68 GTexel / s
- Environ 39% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 2500 MHz versus 1802 MHz
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1282 versus 793
- Environ 82% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 271 versus 149
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 5212 versus 3866
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 21.42 versus 9.392
- 4.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 738.724 versus 157.479
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.068 versus 0.864
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 33.126 versus 16.101
- Environ 83% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 81.823 versus 44.77
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 26.6 GTexel / s versus 15.68 GTexel / s |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2500 MHz versus 1802 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1282 versus 793 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 271 versus 149 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5212 versus 3866 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.42 versus 9.392 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 738.724 versus 157.479 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.068 versus 0.864 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 33.126 versus 16.101 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 81.823 versus 44.77 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 4000M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M | NVIDIA Quadro 4000M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 793 | 1282 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 149 | 271 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3866 | 5212 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.392 | 21.42 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 157.479 | 738.724 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.864 | 2.068 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 16.101 | 33.126 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 44.77 | 81.823 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1589 | 1413 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3235 | 865 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3339 | 1254 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1589 | 1413 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3235 | 865 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3339 | 1254 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 345 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M | NVIDIA Quadro 4000M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
| Nom de code | GK107 | GF104 |
| Date de sortie | 1 April 2013 | 22 February 2011 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1301 | 1303 |
| Genre | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $449 | |
| Prix maintenant | $111.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 19.30 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 980 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 810 MHz | 475 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 752.6 gflops | 638.4 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 336 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 15.68 GTexel / s | 26.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,270 million | 1,950 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | large |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 API | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | 80.0 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1802 MHz | 2500 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | DDR3 / GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GT 740M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 285M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 740M vs
NVIDIAQuadro 4000M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 740M vs
AMDRadeon HD 7660G IGP
NVIDIAGeForce GT 740M vs
NVIDIAQuadro K610M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 740M vs
AMDRadeon R5 235 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GT 740M vs
AMDRadeon R5 M240
