NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 10 mois plus tard
- Environ 48% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1493 MHz versus 1006 MHz
- Environ 53% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1620 MHz versus 1058 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 16 nm versus 28 nm
- 2.6x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 195 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2048 MB
- Environ 17% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 7008 MHz versus 6008 MHz
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 5919 versus 5566
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 20687 versus 18397
- Environ 64% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 75.758 versus 46.086
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.071 versus 4.645
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 301.168 versus 99.577
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8496 versus 7222
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3687 versus 3666
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3336 versus 3306
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8496 versus 7222
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3687 versus 3666
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3336 versus 3306
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2340 versus 2004
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 February 2017 versus 22 March 2012 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1493 MHz versus 1006 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1620 MHz versus 1058 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 16 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 195 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2048 MB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7008 MHz versus 6008 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5919 versus 5566 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 20687 versus 18397 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.758 versus 46.086 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.071 versus 4.645 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 versus 99.577 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 versus 7222 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3687 versus 3666 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 versus 3306 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 versus 7222 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3687 versus 3666 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 versus 3306 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2340 versus 2004 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
- Environ 66% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 128.8 billion / sec versus 77.76 GTexel / s
- 2x plus de pipelines: 1536 versus 768
- Environ 24% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 3,090.4 gflops versus 2,488 gflops
- Environ 64% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 530 versus 323
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 989.685 versus 843.503
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 36.463 versus 24.676
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 128.8 billion / sec versus 77.76 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1536 versus 768 |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,090.4 gflops versus 2,488 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 530 versus 323 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 989.685 versus 843.503 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 36.463 versus 24.676 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5919 | 5566 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 323 | 530 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 20687 | 18397 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.758 | 46.086 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 843.503 | 989.685 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.071 | 4.645 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.676 | 36.463 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 | 99.577 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 | 7222 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3687 | 3666 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 | 3306 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 | 7222 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3687 | 3666 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 | 3306 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2340 | 2004 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
| Nom de code | GP106B | GK104 |
| Date de sortie | 1 February 2017 | 22 March 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 563 | 560 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $499 | |
| Prix maintenant | $579.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 12.83 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1620 MHz | 1058 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1493 MHz | 1006 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,488 gflops | 3,090.4 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 1536 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 77.76 GTexel / s | 128.8 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 195 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 4,400 million | 3,540 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 1536 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Longeur | 10.0" (25.4 cm) | |
| Options SLI | 3-way | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | Two 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.2 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 2048 MB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 112.1 GB / s | 192.2 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 256-bit GDDR5 |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7008 MHz | 6008 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
ATIFireMV 2250
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
NVIDIAQuadro 5010M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
AMDRadeon HD 7550M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 680
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 645 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
NVIDIAQuadro M4000M
