NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB versus AMD FirePro W8100
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB and AMD FirePro W8100 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 83% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1506 MHz versus 824 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 16 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 83% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 120 Watt versus 220 Watt
- Environ 60% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 8008 MHz versus 5000 MHz
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 9784 versus 6812
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 771 versus 755
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 115.073 versus 93.339
- Environ 92% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10566 versus 5494
- Environ 92% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10566 versus 5494
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 18 August 2016 versus 23 June 2014 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1506 MHz versus 824 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 16 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt versus 220 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 8008 MHz versus 5000 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9784 versus 6812 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 771 versus 755 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 115.073 versus 93.339 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10566 versus 5494 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10566 versus 5494 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro W8100
- Environ 7% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 131.8 GTexel / s versus 123.0 GTexel / s
- 2.2x plus de pipelines: 2560 versus 1152
- Environ 7% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 4,219 gflops versus 3,935 gflops
- 2.7x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 3 GB
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 34705 versus 32370
- Environ 76% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2333.922 versus 1325.07
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.816 versus 8.057
- 3.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 112.45 versus 31.946
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 440.107 versus 425.709
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 131.8 GTexel / s versus 123.0 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2560 versus 1152 |
| Performance á point flottant | 4,219 gflops versus 3,935 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 3 GB |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 34705 versus 32370 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2333.922 versus 1325.07 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.816 versus 8.057 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 112.45 versus 31.946 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 440.107 versus 425.709 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3699 versus 3697 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 versus 3338 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3699 versus 3697 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 versus 3338 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W8100
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB | AMD FirePro W8100 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9784 | 6812 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 771 | 755 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 32370 | 34705 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 115.073 | 93.339 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1325.07 | 2333.922 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.057 | 8.816 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.946 | 112.45 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 425.709 | 440.107 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10566 | 5494 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3697 | 3699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3338 | 3349 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10566 | 5494 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3697 | 3699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3338 | 3349 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 157 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB | AMD FirePro W8100 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 2.0 |
| Nom de code | GP106 | Hawaii |
| Date de sortie | 18 August 2016 | 23 June 2014 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $199 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 392 | 394 |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1708 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1506 MHz | 824 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,935 gflops | 4,219 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1152 | 2560 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 123.0 GTexel / s | 131.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 220 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 4,400 million | 6,200 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI |
| Compte DisplayPort | 4 | |
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Sortie du composant vidéo HD | ||
| StereoOutput3D | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 250 mm | 279 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Facteur de forme | Full Height / Full Length | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 3 GB | 8 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 192.2 GB / s | 320 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 Bit | 512 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 8008 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 3 GB vs
ATIRadeon X1800 GTO²
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 3 GB vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7950 GX2
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 3 GB vs
ATIRadeon HD 2900 XT
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 3 GB vs
AMDFirePro W8100
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 3 GB vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 3 GB vs
NVIDIAQuadro P2000
