NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB versus NVIDIA Quadro K2200
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB and NVIDIA Quadro K2200 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 44% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1506 MHz versus 1046 MHz
- Environ 52% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1709 MHz versus 1124 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 136.7 GTexel / s versus 44.96 GTexel / s
- 2x plus de pipelines: 1280 versus 640
- 3x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 4,375 gflops versus 1,439 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 16 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 50% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 6 GB versus 4 GB
- Environ 60% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 8008 MHz versus 5012 MHz
- 2.8x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 10079 versus 3572
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 747 versus 548
- 2.9x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 35369 versus 12020
- 2.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 119.148 versus 40.695
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1373.562 versus 588.094
- 2.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.694 versus 3.205
- 2.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 454.799 versus 166.26
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12442 versus 4921
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3691 versus 1577
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 versus 1671
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12442 versus 4921
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3691 versus 1577
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 versus 1671
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 19 July 2016 versus 22 July 2014 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1506 MHz versus 1046 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1709 MHz versus 1124 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 136.7 GTexel / s versus 44.96 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1280 versus 640 |
| Performance á point flottant | 4,375 gflops versus 1,439 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 16 nm versus 28 nm |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 6 GB versus 4 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 8008 MHz versus 5012 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10079 versus 3572 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 747 versus 548 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 35369 versus 12020 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 119.148 versus 40.695 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1373.562 versus 588.094 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.694 versus 3.205 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 454.799 versus 166.26 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12442 versus 4921 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3691 versus 1577 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 versus 1671 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12442 versus 4921 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3691 versus 1577 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 versus 1671 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K2200
- Environ 76% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 68 Watt versus 120 Watt
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.455 versus 21.766
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1193 versus 907
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 68 Watt versus 120 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.455 versus 21.766 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1193 versus 907 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K2200
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB | NVIDIA Quadro K2200 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10079 | 3572 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 747 | 548 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 35369 | 12020 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 119.148 | 40.695 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1373.562 | 588.094 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.694 | 3.205 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.766 | 30.455 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 454.799 | 166.26 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12442 | 4921 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3691 | 1577 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | 1671 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12442 | 4921 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3691 | 1577 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | 1671 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 907 | 1193 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB | NVIDIA Quadro K2200 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell |
| Nom de code | GP106 | GM107 |
| Date de sortie | 19 July 2016 | 22 July 2014 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $299 | $395.75 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 356 | 787 |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
| Prix maintenant | $343.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 13.01 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1709 MHz | 1124 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1506 MHz | 1046 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 4,375 gflops | 1,439 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 640 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 136.7 GTexel / s | 44.96 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 68 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 4,400 million | 1,870 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 250 mm | 202 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | None |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 6 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 192.2 GB / s | 80.19 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 8008 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 6 GB vs
ATIRadeon X1950 CrossFire Edition
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 6 GB vs
AMDRadeon E8870
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 6 GB vs
NVIDIATitan X Pascal
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 6 GB vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 6 GB vs
AMDRadeon RX 580 2048SP
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 6 GB vs
IntelArc A570M
