NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 6 ans 7 mois plus tard
- Environ 52% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1485 MHz versus 980 MHz
- Environ 61% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1665 MHz versus 1033 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 28 nm
- 1333.3x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 8000 MHz versus 6.0 GB/s
- Environ 96% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 7881 versus 4017
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 564 versus 487
- 3.4x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 39165 versus 11364
- 4.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 134.765 versus 30.505
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1316.075 versus 705.293
- 2.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.799 versus 3.085
- 2.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 94.915 versus 35.416
- 9.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 573.418 versus 62.69
- 3.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10959 versus 3581
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 versus 3690
- 3.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10959 versus 3581
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 versus 3690
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 30 April 2019 versus 6 September 2012 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1485 MHz versus 980 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1665 MHz versus 1033 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 28 nm |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 8000 MHz versus 6.0 GB/s |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7881 versus 4017 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 564 versus 487 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 39165 versus 11364 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 134.765 versus 30.505 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1316.075 versus 705.293 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.799 versus 3.085 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.915 versus 35.416 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 573.418 versus 62.69 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10959 versus 3581 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 versus 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10959 versus 3581 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 versus 3690 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
- 4.3x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1307 versus 305
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3365 versus 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3365 versus 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1307 versus 305 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7881 | 4017 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 564 | 487 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 39165 | 11364 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 134.765 | 30.505 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1316.075 | 705.293 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.799 | 3.085 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.915 | 35.416 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 573.418 | 62.69 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10959 | 3581 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3365 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10959 | 3581 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3365 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 305 | 1307 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Kepler |
| Nom de code | TU107 | GK106 |
| Date de sortie | 30 April 2019 | 6 September 2012 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $179 | $229 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 376 | 740 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix maintenant | $349.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 14.35 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1665 MHz | 1033 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1485 MHz | 980 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Noyaux CUDA | 960 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,981 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 960 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 78.4 billion / sec | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt | |
| Compte de transistor | 2,540 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Compte DisplayPort | 1 | |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | One 6-pin |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Longeur | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
Mémoire |
||
| Vitesse de mémoire | 8000 MHz | 6.0 GB/s |
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 144.2 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 192-bit GDDR5 | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 vs
ATIRadeon HD 4810
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 980
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 vs
NVIDIATesla M6
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P3000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 vs
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 vs
NVIDIATesla K80
