NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER versus AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 22% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1530 MHz versus 1250 MHz
- Environ 32% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1785 MHz versus 1350 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 157.1 GTexel/s versus 345.6 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 14 nm
- 2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 125 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 810 versus 805
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 187.131 versus 142.691
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2548.187 versus 1729.558
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 15.882 versus 12.693
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 117.673 versus 111.376
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 17812 versus 13339
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 17812 versus 13339
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 29 Oct 2019 versus 27 June 2017 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1530 MHz versus 1250 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1785 MHz versus 1350 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 157.1 GTexel/s versus 345.6 GTexel / s |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt versus 250 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 810 versus 805 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 187.131 versus 142.691 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2548.187 versus 1729.558 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 15.882 versus 12.693 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.673 versus 111.376 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17812 versus 13339 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 3709 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17812 versus 13339 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 3709 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64
- 2.9x plus de pipelines: 4096 versus 1408
- 2.7x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 16 GB versus 6 GB
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 12984 versus 12777
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 71464 versus 62617
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1396.172 versus 901.388
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 4096 versus 1408 |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 16 GB versus 6 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12984 versus 12777 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 71464 versus 62617 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1396.172 versus 901.388 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 versus 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 versus 3351 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12777 | 12984 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 810 | 805 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 62617 | 71464 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 187.131 | 142.691 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2548.187 | 1729.558 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 15.882 | 12.693 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.673 | 111.376 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 901.388 | 1396.172 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17812 | 13339 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3709 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17812 | 13339 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3709 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3353 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5978 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
| Nom de code | TU116 | Vega 10 |
| Date de sortie | 29 Oct 2019 | 27 June 2017 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $229 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 207 | 226 |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1785 MHz | 1350 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1530 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 157.1 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 10.05 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.027 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1408 | 4096 |
| Pixel fill rate | 85.68 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 157.1 GTexel/s | 345.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 6600 million | 12,500 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 11,059 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 9 inches (229 mm) | 267 mm |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | None |
| Largeur | Dual-slot | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 6 GB | 16 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 336.0 GB/s | 402.4 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 bit | 2048 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1572 MHz | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs
NVIDIAGRID M10-8Q
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs
NVIDIATesla V100 PCIe 16 GB
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs
IntelArc A310
