NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 7 mois plus tard
- Environ 3% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1530 MHz versus 1481 MHz
- Environ 13% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1785 MHz versus 1582 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 157.1 GTexel/s versus 354.4 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 16 nm
- 2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 125 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2548.187 versus 2406.499
- 4.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 117.673 versus 25.833
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 17812 versus 15019
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 17812 versus 15019
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 29 Oct 2019 versus 10 March 2017 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1530 MHz versus 1481 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1785 MHz versus 1582 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 157.1 GTexel/s versus 354.4 GTexel / s |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt versus 250 Watt |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 62624 versus 62508 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2548.187 versus 2406.499 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.673 versus 25.833 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17812 versus 15019 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17812 versus 15019 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 3716 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
- 2.5x plus de pipelines: 3584 versus 1408
- Environ 83% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 11 GB versus 6 GB
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 18558 versus 12776
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 937 versus 810
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 205.837 versus 187.131
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 19.591 versus 15.882
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1002.573 versus 901.388
- Environ 65% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 9870 versus 5978
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 3584 versus 1408 |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 11 GB versus 6 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 18558 versus 12776 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 937 versus 810 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 205.837 versus 187.131 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 19.591 versus 15.882 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1002.573 versus 901.388 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 3351 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9870 versus 5978 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12776 | 18558 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 810 | 937 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 62624 | 62508 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 187.131 | 205.837 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2548.187 | 2406.499 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 15.882 | 19.591 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.673 | 25.833 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 901.388 | 1002.573 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17812 | 15019 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17812 | 15019 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3357 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5978 | 9870 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Nom de code | TU116 | GP102 |
| Date de sortie | 29 Oct 2019 | 10 March 2017 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $229 | $699 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 207 | 201 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix maintenant | $826.98 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 27.48 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1785 MHz | 1582 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1530 MHz | 1481 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 157.1 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 10.05 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.027 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1408 | 3584 |
| Pixel fill rate | 85.68 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 157.1 GTexel/s | 354.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 6600 million | 11,800 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 11,340 gflops | |
| Température maximale du GPU | 91 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 9 inches (229 mm) | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 350 Watt | 600 Watt |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Largeur | Dual-slot | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 6 GB | 11 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 336.0 GB/s | 484.4 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 bit | 352 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 11008 MHz | |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Ansel | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| HDMI 2.0b | ||
| PCIe 3.0 | ||
| SLI | ||
| Virtual Reality | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs
NVIDIAGRID M10-8Q
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs
NVIDIATesla V100 PCIe 16 GB
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs
AMDRadeon RX 5600M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs
AMDRadeon RX 590 GME
