NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 73% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1530 MHz versus 885 MHz
- Environ 51% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1785 MHz versus 1185 MHz
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 12776 versus 11744
- Environ 68% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 810 versus 483
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 187.131 versus 168.08
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2548.187 versus 1935.102
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 117.673 versus 111.023
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 17812 versus 17328
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 17812 versus 17328
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 29 Oct 2019 versus 29 January 2019 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1530 MHz versus 885 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1785 MHz versus 1185 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12776 versus 11744 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 810 versus 483 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 187.131 versus 168.08 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2548.187 versus 1935.102 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.673 versus 111.023 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17812 versus 17328 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17812 versus 17328 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
- Environ 64% de pipelines plus haut: 2304 versus 1408
- Environ 9% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 115 Watt versus 125 Watt
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 78205 versus 62624
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 22.794 versus 15.882
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1001.496 versus 901.388
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8912 versus 3717
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8055 versus 3351
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8912 versus 3717
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8055 versus 3351
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 6839 versus 5978
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 2304 versus 1408 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt versus 125 Watt |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 78205 versus 62624 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 22.794 versus 15.882 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1001.496 versus 901.388 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8912 versus 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8055 versus 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8912 versus 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8055 versus 3351 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6839 versus 5978 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12776 | 11744 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 810 | 483 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 62624 | 78205 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 187.131 | 168.08 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2548.187 | 1935.102 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 15.882 | 22.794 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.673 | 111.023 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 901.388 | 1001.496 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17812 | 17328 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 8912 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 8055 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17812 | 17328 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 8912 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 8055 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5978 | 6839 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Nom de code | TU116 | TU106 |
| Date de sortie | 29 Oct 2019 | 29 January 2019 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $229 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 207 | 178 |
| Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1785 MHz | 1185 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1530 MHz | 885 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 157.1 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 10.05 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.027 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1408 | 2304 |
| Pixel fill rate | 85.68 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 157.1 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 115 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 6600 million | 10,800 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 9 inches (229 mm) | |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | None |
| Largeur | Dual-slot | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 6 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 336.0 GB/s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 bit | 256 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs
NVIDIAGRID M10-8Q
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs
NVIDIATesla V100 PCIe 16 GB
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs
AMDRadeon RX 5600M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile
