NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q versus NVIDIA Tesla T4
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q and NVIDIA Tesla T4 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 7 mois plus tard
- Environ 13% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1140 MHz versus 1005 MHz
- Environ 25% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 60 Watt versus 75 Watt
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 195.93 versus 127.622
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 versus 1976
- Environ 89% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 versus 1781
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 versus 1976
- Environ 89% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 versus 1781
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 23 April 2019 versus 13 September 2018 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1140 MHz versus 1005 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt versus 75 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 195.93 versus 127.622 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 1976 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 1781 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 1976 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 1781 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Tesla T4
- Environ 13% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1515 MHz versus 1335 MHz
- 6.7x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 10000 MHz versus 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 10909 versus 8627
- Environ 64% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 596 versus 364
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 61276 versus 53834
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3026.812 versus 1919.95
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 18.798 versus 14.6
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 119.936 versus 94.964
- Environ 85% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 910.721 versus 492.867
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14076 versus 12301
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14076 versus 12301
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1515 MHz versus 1335 MHz |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 10000 MHz versus 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10909 versus 8627 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 596 versus 364 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 61276 versus 53834 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3026.812 versus 1919.95 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 18.798 versus 14.6 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 119.936 versus 94.964 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 910.721 versus 492.867 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14076 versus 12301 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14076 versus 12301 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla T4
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | NVIDIA Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8627 | 10909 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 364 | 596 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 53834 | 61276 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 195.93 | 127.622 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1919.95 | 3026.812 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.6 | 18.798 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.964 | 119.936 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 492.867 | 910.721 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12301 | 14076 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 1976 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 1781 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12301 | 14076 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 1976 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 1781 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4905 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | NVIDIA Tesla T4 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Nom de code | TU116 | TU104 |
| Date de sortie | 23 April 2019 | 13 September 2018 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 333 | 263 |
| Genre | Laptop | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1335 MHz | 1515 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1140 MHz | 1005 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 128.2 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.202 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.101 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1536 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 64.08 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 128.2 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 6600 million | 13,600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 6 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 288.0 GB/s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | 10000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs
AMDFirePro W9000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon RX 580
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs
NVIDIAQuadro P3200 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon RX 580 2048SP
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon Pro W5500
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs
NVIDIACMP 30HX
