NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 versus AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 7 mois plus tard
- Environ 34% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1530 MHz versus 1138 MHz
- Environ 43% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1785 MHz versus 1250 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 14 nm
- Environ 75% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 120 Watt versus 210 Watt
- 5.1x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 8004 MHz versus 1572 MHz
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 189.842 versus 153.117
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1902.867 versus 1722.138
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 13.408 versus 11.901
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14998 versus 12822
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14998 versus 12822
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 14 March 2019 versus 14 August 2017 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1530 MHz versus 1138 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1785 MHz versus 1250 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt versus 210 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 8004 MHz versus 1572 MHz |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 189.842 versus 153.117 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1902.867 versus 1722.138 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.408 versus 11.901 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14998 versus 12822 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14998 versus 12822 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3353 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 12354 versus 11675
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 828 versus 779
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 61544 versus 57905
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 126.528 versus 116.183
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1172.788 versus 875.838
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12354 versus 11675 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 828 versus 779 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 61544 versus 57905 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 126.528 versus 116.183 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1172.788 versus 875.838 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11675 | 12354 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 779 | 828 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57905 | 61544 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 189.842 | 153.117 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1902.867 | 1722.138 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.408 | 11.901 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 116.183 | 126.528 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 875.838 | 1172.788 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14998 | 12822 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14998 | 12822 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3353 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5414 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
Nom de code | TU116 | Vega 10 |
Date de sortie | 14 March 2019 | 14 August 2017 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $219 | $399 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 251 | 249 |
Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1785 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1530 MHz | 1138 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 210 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 6,600 million | 12,500 million |
Performance á point flottant | 9,677 gflops | |
Pipelines | 3584 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 302.4 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compte DisplayPort | 1 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 229 mm | 267 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | None |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
Vitesse de mémoire | 8004 MHz | 1572 MHz |
RAM maximale | 8 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 402.4 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 2048 Bit | |
Genre de mémoire | HBM2 |