NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M versus NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 41% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 106 Watt
- Environ 50% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 1536 MB versus 1 GB
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 13.598 versus 12.611
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 25.333 versus 25.132
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3341 versus 3313
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3341 versus 3313
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 30 May 2011 versus 15 March 2011 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 106 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 1536 MB versus 1 GB |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 13.598 versus 12.611 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.333 versus 25.132 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3341 versus 3313 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3341 versus 3313 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
- Environ 1% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 783 MHz versus 775 MHz
- Environ 1% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 25.06 GTexel / s versus 24.8 billion / sec
- Environ 1% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 601.3 gflops versus 595.2 gflops
- 2.9x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 3608 MHz versus 1250 MHz
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 422.002 versus 404.618
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.255 versus 1.227
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 49.9 versus 44.123
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2166 versus 1857
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3360 versus 3275
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2166 versus 1857
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3360 versus 3275
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 783 MHz versus 775 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 25.06 GTexel / s versus 24.8 billion / sec |
| Performance á point flottant | 601.3 gflops versus 595.2 gflops |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 3608 MHz versus 1250 MHz |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 422.002 versus 404.618 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.255 versus 1.227 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 49.9 versus 44.123 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2166 versus 1857 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3360 versus 3275 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2166 versus 1857 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3360 versus 3275 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1274 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 266 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4769 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 13.598 | 12.611 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 404.618 | 422.002 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.227 | 1.255 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.333 | 25.132 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 44.123 | 49.9 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1857 | 2166 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3275 | 3360 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3341 | 3313 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1857 | 2166 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3275 | 3360 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3341 | 3313 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Nom de code | GF116 | GF116 |
| Date de sortie | 30 May 2011 | 15 March 2011 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1144 | 1145 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 775 MHz | 783 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 192 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 595.2 gflops | 601.3 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 192 | 192 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 24.8 billion / sec | 25.06 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 106 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,170 million | 1,170 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Options SLI | 2-way | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Longeur | 210 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 API | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 1536 MB | 1 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1250 MHz | 3608 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 57.7 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560M vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX 5700 LE
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6200 SE TurboCache
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560M vs
AMDRadeon HD 7730M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560M vs
AMDRadeon HD 8570 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 750M
