NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 7 mois plus tard
- Environ 21% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 941 MHz versus 775 MHz
- Environ 25% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 30.94 GTexel / s versus 24.8 billion / sec
- 2x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 192
- Environ 25% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 742.7 gflops versus 595.2 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- Environ 50% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 50 Watt versus 75 Watt
- Environ 33% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 2 GB versus 1536 MB
- 3.2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 4012 MHz versus 1250 MHz
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1330 versus 1261
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 15.67 versus 13.598
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2351 versus 1857
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3520 versus 3275
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2351 versus 1857
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3520 versus 3275
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 9 January 2013 versus 30 May 2011 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 941 MHz versus 775 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 30.94 GTexel / s versus 24.8 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 384 versus 192 |
| Performance á point flottant | 742.7 gflops versus 595.2 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt versus 75 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1536 MB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4012 MHz versus 1250 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1330 versus 1261 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.67 versus 13.598 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2351 versus 1857 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3520 versus 3275 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2351 versus 1857 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3520 versus 3275 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 261 versus 244
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 4919 versus 4258
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 404.618 versus 251.09
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.227 versus 1.144
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 25.333 versus 10.872
- 3.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 44.123 versus 13.423
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 261 versus 244 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4919 versus 4258 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 404.618 versus 251.09 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.227 versus 1.144 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.333 versus 10.872 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 44.123 versus 13.423 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3341 versus 3334 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3341 versus 3334 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1330 | 1261 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 244 | 261 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4258 | 4919 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.67 | 13.598 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 251.09 | 404.618 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.144 | 1.227 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.872 | 25.333 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 13.423 | 44.123 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2351 | 1857 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3520 | 3275 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3334 | 3341 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2351 | 1857 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3520 | 3275 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3334 | 3341 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 461 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi 2.0 |
| Nom de code | GK107 | GF116 |
| Date de sortie | 9 January 2013 | 30 May 2011 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1172 | 1173 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 967 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 941 MHz | 775 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 742.7 gflops | 595.2 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 192 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 30.94 GTexel / s | 24.8 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,270 million | 1,170 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 192 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI-E 2.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | large |
| Options SLI | 2-way | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 API | 12 API |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1536 MB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 64.19 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4012 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | DDR3 / GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GT 750M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9300M G
NVIDIAGeForce GT 750M vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 3400
NVIDIAGeForce GT 750M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 750M vs
AMDRadeon HD 8670M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 750M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 675MX Mac Edition
NVIDIAGeForce GT 750M vs
AMDRadeon R7 M350
