NVIDIA GRID K520 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GRID K520 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GRID K520
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 10 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 2x 102.0 GTexel / s billion / sec versus 78.4 billion / sec
- 3.2x plus de pipelines: 2x 1536 versus 960
- 2.5x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2x 2,448 gflops versus 1,981 gflops
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2x 4 GB versus 2 GB
- 833.3x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5000 MHz versus 6.0 GB/s
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1063.784 versus 705.293
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.244 versus 3.085
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 42.277 versus 35.416
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 76.158 versus 62.69
- Environ 89% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6782 versus 3581
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3713 versus 3690
- Environ 89% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6782 versus 3581
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3713 versus 3690
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 23 July 2013 versus 6 September 2012 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 2x 102.0 GTexel / s billion / sec versus 78.4 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 2x 1536 versus 960 |
Performance á point flottant | 2x 2,448 gflops versus 1,981 gflops |
Taille de mémore maximale | 2x 4 GB versus 2 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5000 MHz versus 6.0 GB/s |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1063.784 versus 705.293 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.244 versus 3.085 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 42.277 versus 35.416 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 76.158 versus 62.69 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6782 versus 3581 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 versus 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6782 versus 3581 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 versus 3690 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
- Environ 32% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 980 MHz versus 745 MHz
- Environ 61% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 140 Watt versus 225 Watt
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 4014 versus 3516
- 3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 485 versus 160
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 11372 versus 10864
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 30.505 versus 20.97
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 980 MHz versus 745 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt versus 225 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4014 versus 3516 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 485 versus 160 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11372 versus 10864 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.505 versus 20.97 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3365 versus 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3365 versus 3354 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GRID K520
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GRID K520 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3516 | 4014 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 160 | 485 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10864 | 11372 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 20.97 | 30.505 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1063.784 | 705.293 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.244 | 3.085 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 42.277 | 35.416 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 76.158 | 62.69 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6782 | 3581 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 3365 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6782 | 3581 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 3365 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1307 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GRID K520 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
Nom de code | GK104 | GK106 |
Date de sortie | 23 July 2013 | 6 September 2012 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $3,599 | $229 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 769 | 757 |
Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
Prix maintenant | $349.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 14.35 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 745 MHz | 980 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 2x 2,448 gflops | 1,981 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2x 1536 | 960 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 2x 102.0 GTexel / s billion / sec | 78.4 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 140 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 3,540 million | 2,540 million |
Vitesse augmenté | 1033 MHz | |
Noyaux CUDA | 960 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 267 mm | 9.5" (24.1 cm) |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | One 6-pin |
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2x 4 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 2x 160.0 GB / s | 144.2 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 2x 256 Bit | 192-bit GDDR5 |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5000 MHz | 6.0 GB/s |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |