NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 30% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 100 Watt versus 130 Watt
- Environ 33% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 2 GB versus 1536 MB
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 October 2012 versus 22 August 2012 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt versus 130 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1536 MB |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3334 versus 3325 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3334 versus 3325 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM
- Environ 37% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 823 MHz versus 600 MHz
- Environ 78% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 85.25 GTexel / s versus 48.0 billion / sec
- Environ 20% de pipelines plus haut: 1152 versus 960
- Environ 63% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,046 gflops versus 1,256 gflops
- 3.1x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5600 MHz versus 1800 MHz
- Environ 79% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 32.718 versus 18.251
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1021.371 versus 665.068
- Environ 65% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.143 versus 1.9
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 56.509 versus 36.241
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 67.697 versus 62.895
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5983 versus 4175
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3665 versus 3383
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5983 versus 4175
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3665 versus 3383
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 823 MHz versus 600 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 85.25 GTexel / s versus 48.0 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 1152 versus 960 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,046 gflops versus 1,256 gflops |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5600 MHz versus 1800 MHz |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 32.718 versus 18.251 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1021.371 versus 665.068 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.143 versus 1.9 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 56.509 versus 36.241 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 67.697 versus 62.895 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5983 versus 4175 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3665 versus 3383 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5983 versus 4175 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3665 versus 3383 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2745 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 382 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10780 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.251 | 32.718 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 665.068 | 1021.371 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.9 | 3.143 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 36.241 | 56.509 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 62.895 | 67.697 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4175 | 5983 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3383 | 3665 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3334 | 3325 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4175 | 5983 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3383 | 3665 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3334 | 3325 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Nom de code | GK104 | GK104 |
| Date de sortie | 1 October 2012 | 22 August 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 819 | 820 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 600 MHz | 823 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 960 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,256 gflops | 2,046 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 960 | 1152 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 48.0 billion / sec | 85.25 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 130 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3,540 million | 3,540 million |
| Vitesse augmenté | 888 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Options SLI | 2-way | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Longeur | 241 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 API | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1536 MB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 115.2 GB / s | 134.4 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 5600 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| FXAA | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 675MX vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 Ti
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 675MX vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 460 v2
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 675MX vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 675MX vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 670MX
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 675MX vs
AMDRadeon HD 7790
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 675MX vs
AMDRadeon E9260 PCIe
