NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX versus AMD Radeon HD 6870
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX and AMD Radeon HD 6870 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- Environ 51% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 100 Watt versus 151 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 71% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1800 MHz versus 1050 MHz
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2717 versus 2216
- 2.2x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 10767 versus 4950
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 18.251 versus 16.41
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.9 versus 1.346
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 October 2012 versus 21 October 2010 |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt versus 151 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz versus 1050 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2717 versus 2216 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10767 versus 4950 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.251 versus 16.41 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.9 versus 1.346 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 6870
- Environ 5% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 50.4 GTexel / s versus 48.0 billion / sec
- Environ 17% de pipelines plus haut: 1120 versus 960
- Environ 61% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,016.0 gflops versus 1,256 gflops
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 410 versus 371
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 857.798 versus 665.068
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 45.514 versus 36.241
- 2.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 184.41 versus 62.895
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4238 versus 4175
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3711 versus 3383
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4238 versus 4175
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3711 versus 3383
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 50.4 GTexel / s versus 48.0 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 1120 versus 960 |
Performance á point flottant | 2,016.0 gflops versus 1,256 gflops |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 410 versus 371 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 857.798 versus 665.068 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.514 versus 36.241 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 184.41 versus 62.895 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4238 versus 4175 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3711 versus 3383 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 versus 3334 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4238 versus 4175 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3711 versus 3383 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 versus 3334 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6870
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX | AMD Radeon HD 6870 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2717 | 2216 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 371 | 410 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10767 | 4950 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.251 | 16.41 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 665.068 | 857.798 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.9 | 1.346 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 36.241 | 45.514 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 62.895 | 184.41 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4175 | 4238 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3383 | 3711 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3334 | 3349 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4175 | 4238 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3383 | 3711 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3334 | 3349 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX | AMD Radeon HD 6870 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
Nom de code | GK104 | Barts |
Date de sortie | 1 October 2012 | 21 October 2010 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 837 | 840 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Conception | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $239 | |
Prix maintenant | $89.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 38.38 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 600 MHz | |
Noyaux CUDA | 960 | |
Performance á point flottant | 1,256 gflops | 2,016.0 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 960 | 1120 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 48.0 billion / sec | 50.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 151 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 3,540 million | 1,700 million |
Vitesse augmenté | 900 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Eyefinity | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Options SLI | 2-way | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 2x 6-pin |
Longeur | 220 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 11 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 115.2 GB / s | 134.4 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
FXAA | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire |