NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 7 mois plus tard
- Environ 8% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1127 MHz versus 1046 MHz
- Environ 9% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1178 MHz versus 1085 MHz
- Environ 92% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 120 Watt versus 230 Watt
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 6100 versus 5929
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 673 versus 561
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 18663 versus 18011
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 73.733 versus 49.824
- Environ 93% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 200.825 versus 103.884
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 22 January 2015 versus 30 May 2013 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1127 MHz versus 1046 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1178 MHz versus 1085 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt versus 230 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6100 versus 5929 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 673 versus 561 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 18663 versus 18011 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 73.733 versus 49.824 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 200.825 versus 103.884 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3691 versus 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3691 versus 3690 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770
- Environ 86% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 134 billion / sec versus 72 billion / sec
- Environ 50% de pipelines plus haut: 1536 versus 1024
- Environ 38% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 3,333 gflops versus 2,413 gflops
- 1001.7x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 7012 MHz versus 7.0 GB/s
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1089.67 versus 792.44
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 44.06 versus 35.338
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7412 versus 7218
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7412 versus 7218
- 13.7x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2155 versus 157
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 134 billion / sec versus 72 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 1536 versus 1024 |
Performance á point flottant | 3,333 gflops versus 2,413 gflops |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7012 MHz versus 7.0 GB/s |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1089.67 versus 792.44 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.899 versus 4.888 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.06 versus 35.338 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7412 versus 7218 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 versus 3335 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7412 versus 7218 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 versus 3335 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2155 versus 157 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6100 | 5929 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 673 | 561 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 18663 | 18011 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 73.733 | 49.824 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 792.44 | 1089.67 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.888 | 4.899 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.338 | 44.06 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 200.825 | 103.884 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7218 | 7412 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3691 | 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3335 | 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7218 | 7412 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3691 | 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3335 | 3340 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 157 | 2155 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Kepler |
Nom de code | GM206 | GK104 |
Date de sortie | 22 January 2015 | 30 May 2013 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $199 | $399 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 524 | 525 |
Prix maintenant | $229.99 | $449.99 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 34.63 | 15.45 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1178 MHz | 1085 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1127 MHz | 1046 MHz |
Noyaux CUDA | 1024 | 1536 |
Performance á point flottant | 2,413 gflops | 3,333 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1024 | 1536 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 72 billion / sec | 134 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 230 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 2,940 million | 3,540 million |
Température maximale du GPU | 98 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | Internal |
Connecteurs d’écran | Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
HDCP | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | 4.376" (11.1 cm) |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 400 Watt | |
Options SLI | 2x | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pins | One 8-pin and one 6-pin |
Énergie du systeme minimum recommandé | 600 Watt | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.3 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 112 GB / s | 224.3 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7.0 GB/s | 7012 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
FXAA | ||
PhysX | ||
TXAA |