NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 73% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 130 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 3 GB versus 1536 MB
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 87.659 versus 67.697
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 30 May 2013 versus 22 August 2012 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 130 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 3 GB versus 1536 MB |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 87.659 versus 67.697 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3331 versus 3325 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3331 versus 3325 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM
- Environ 1% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 823 MHz versus 811 MHz
- Environ 11% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 888 MHz versus 797 MHz
- Environ 34% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 85.25 GTexel / s versus 63.76 GTexel / s
- Environ 20% de pipelines plus haut: 1152 versus 960
- Environ 34% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,046 gflops versus 1,530 gflops
- 2.8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5600 MHz versus 2000 MHz
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 32.718 versus 29.528
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1021.371 versus 731.755
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.143 versus 2.486
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 56.509 versus 42.15
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5983 versus 4133
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5983 versus 4133
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 823 MHz versus 811 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 888 MHz versus 797 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 85.25 GTexel / s versus 63.76 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1152 versus 960 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,046 gflops versus 1,530 gflops |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5600 MHz versus 2000 MHz |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 32.718 versus 29.528 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1021.371 versus 731.755 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.143 versus 2.486 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 56.509 versus 42.15 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5983 versus 4133 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3665 versus 3651 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5983 versus 4133 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3665 versus 3651 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2794 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 341 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8570 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 29.528 | 32.718 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 731.755 | 1021.371 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.486 | 3.143 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 42.15 | 56.509 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 87.659 | 67.697 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4133 | 5983 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3651 | 3665 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3331 | 3325 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4133 | 5983 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3651 | 3665 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3331 | 3325 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 964 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Nom de code | GK106 | GK104 |
| Date de sortie | 30 May 2013 | 22 August 2012 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $189.99 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 844 | 847 |
| Prix maintenant | $177.99 | |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 19.67 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 797 MHz | 888 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 811 MHz | 823 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 960 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,530 gflops | 2,046 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 960 | 1152 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 63.76 GTexel / s | 85.25 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 130 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 2,540 million | 3,540 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Options SLI | 1 | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Longeur | 241 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 API | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 3 GB | 1536 MB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 96.0 GB / s | 134.4 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz | 5600 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 770M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 770M vs
AMDRadeon HD 8790M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 770M vs
AMDRadeon HD 8210E
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 770M vs
AMDRadeon R7 350X OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 770M vs
AMDRadeon R9 M390
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 770M vs
IntelIris Plus Graphics 645
