NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M versus ATI Radeon HD 5850
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M and ATI Radeon HD 5850 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 32% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 954 MHz versus 725 MHz
- Environ 37% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 993 MHz versus 725 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 127.1 GTexel / s versus 52.2 GTexel / s
- Environ 7% de pipelines plus haut: 1536 versus 1440
- Environ 46% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 3,050 gflops versus 2,088.0 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- Environ 24% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 122 Watt versus 151 Watt
- 8x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 93% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3803 versus 1968
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 46.273 versus 16.467
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.914 versus 1.541
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4501 versus 3806
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4501 versus 3806
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 12 March 2014 versus 30 September 2009 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 954 MHz versus 725 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 993 MHz versus 725 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 127.1 GTexel / s versus 52.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1536 versus 1440 |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,050 gflops versus 2,088.0 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 122 Watt versus 151 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 1 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3803 versus 1968 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.273 versus 16.467 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.914 versus 1.541 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4501 versus 3806 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4501 versus 3806 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 3715 |
Raisons pour considerer le ATI Radeon HD 5850
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 410 versus 332
- 2.3x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 33977 versus 15023
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1109.612 versus 777.677
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 42.08 versus 38.196
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 410 versus 332 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 33977 versus 15023 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1109.612 versus 777.677 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 42.08 versus 38.196 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3356 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5850
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M | ATI Radeon HD 5850 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3803 | 1968 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 332 | 410 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 15023 | 33977 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.273 | 16.467 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 777.677 | 1109.612 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.914 | 1.541 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.196 | 42.08 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 82.511 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4501 | 3806 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4501 | 3806 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1611 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M | ATI Radeon HD 5850 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
| Nom de code | GK104 | Cypress |
| Date de sortie | 12 March 2014 | 30 September 2009 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 761 | 764 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Conception | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $299 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 993 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 954 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 1536 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,050 gflops | 2,088.0 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 1440 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 127.1 GTexel / s | 52.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 122 Watt | 151 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3,540 million | 2,154 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 2x 6-pin |
| Longeur | 241 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 160.0 GB / s | 128.0 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | GDDR5 | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
ATIRadeon HD 5850
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
NVIDIATesla C2070
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
AMDRadeon HD 8970 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
AMDRadeon 630
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
IntelUHD Graphics 750
