Intel UHD Graphics 750 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 750 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Soutien API, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 750
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 10 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 31% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1300 MHz versus 993 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 20.80 GTexel/s versus 127.1 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 8.1x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 122 Watt
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 359 versus 330
- 3.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 11068 versus 3356
- 3.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 11068 versus 3356
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 2021 versus 12 March 2014 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1300 MHz versus 993 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 20.80 GTexel/s versus 127.1 GTexel / s |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 122 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 359 versus 330 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 11068 versus 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 11068 versus 3356 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
- 3.2x plus de vitesse du noyau: 954 MHz versus 300 MHz
- 6x plus de pipelines: 1536 versus 256
- 2.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3817 versus 1727
- 2.3x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 15023 versus 6464
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 46.273 versus 35.179
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 777.677 versus 543.594
- Environ 96% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.914 versus 1.995
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 38.196 versus 29.322
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4501 versus 2899
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 versus 3219
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4501 versus 2899
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 versus 3219
- 2.5x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1611 versus 641
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 954 MHz versus 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 1536 versus 256 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3817 versus 1727 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 15023 versus 6464 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.273 versus 35.179 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 777.677 versus 543.594 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.914 versus 1.995 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.196 versus 29.322 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4501 versus 2899 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 3219 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4501 versus 2899 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 3219 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1611 versus 641 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 750
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | Intel UHD Graphics 750 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1727 | 3817 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 359 | 330 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6464 | 15023 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 35.179 | 46.273 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 543.594 | 777.677 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.995 | 3.914 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.322 | 38.196 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2899 | 4501 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3219 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 11068 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2899 | 4501 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3219 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 11068 | 3356 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 641 | 1611 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 82.511 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel UHD Graphics 750 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 12.1 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Rocket Lake GT1 | GK104 |
| Date de sortie | 2021 | 12 March 2014 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 760 | 763 |
| Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1300 MHz | 993 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 32 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 954 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 166.4 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1331 GFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 665.6 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 256 | 1536 |
| Pixel fill rate | 10.40 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 20.80 GTexel/s | 127.1 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 122 Watt |
| Noyaux CUDA | 1536 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,050 gflops | |
| Compte de transistor | 3,540 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 160.0 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel UHD Graphics 750 avec des autres
IntelUHD Graphics 750 vs
ATIRadeon HD 4290 IGP
IntelUHD Graphics 750 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 480
IntelUHD Graphics 750 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660
IntelUHD Graphics 750 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M
IntelUHD Graphics 750 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960M
IntelUHD Graphics 750 vs
AMDRadeon 630
